![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Is this Dutch? LOL I have no clue :p On this cover, it shows: TPM = 138, AOTC = 142, ROTS = 140, ANH = 125, ESB = 128, ROTJ = 135 My DVDs: TPM = 133, AOTC = 142, ROTS = 140, ANH = 123, ESB = 129, ROTJ = 136 I know that the UK set had all shorter times, most were about 7 minutes shorter |
Quote:
|
http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/9126/sagavx.jpg
Here's Cook's pic. He actually addressed it earlier (Thanks ;)), but evidently it was buried quickly. It shots TPM = 130 (or is it 138?), AOTC = 136, ROTS = 134, ANH = 119, ESB = 122, ROTJ = 130 |
Quote:
Phantom Menace guys, seriously, not one of us has seen it like it will be presented on blu ray in over TEN years! That alone is worth the purchase of the set. |
Hey guys, be thankful Universal isn't doing this. They are quickly becoming the big studio that loves to mess with transfers, considering recent releases full of EE and DNR.
|
Quote:
TPM DVD = 136 AOTC DVD = 142 ROTS DVD = 140 ANH DVD = 125 TESB DVD = 127 ROTJ DVD = 135 I think that's a 136 on the Denmark cover for TPM making all the times the same with possibly an extra minute on ESB. Then again, it depends how they round these things and run times on packages are always wrong. My Empire DVD even says 129 minutes when it's clearly not. Conclusion: Whatever run time is written on the boxes cannot be trusted. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think it's obvious that the UK times are accidentally listed as PAL. If you add 4% for the speedup the times will match up with the U.S. times.
|
Quote:
Also, you shouldn't be speeding PAL video up, you should be slowing it down... A 1 minute NTSC video is 1500 frames. If you convert that to PAL, it's 1 minute and 2.5 seconds. So if the films were incorrectly listed as PAL, they should be longer. |
Quote:
I'm off to see "Are you afraid of the dark?" :D good night |
I still can't believe some fans are still complaining about the blu-rays even through its been said that most of the A/V fixes from the dvd releases of the ot have been corrected. Well I guess you can't please everyone. I don't care what the complainers say the star wars saga on blu-ray is going to be a great box set.
|
Sorry, not blu-ray related
But has anyone with a "THX Certified" TV tried watching the 2004 DVDs in THX Mode? I watched ESB yesterday and was amazed at how different the movie looked under properly calibrated settings. In most Hoth scenes, the snow was actually white (there was the odd blue shot)! Vader's saber did not look pink for a second, although the issue with the cores bleeding was still present. Also, no garbage mattes to be seen. Previously, I've only watched the Star Wars DVDs on my bedroom TV, which is obviously not calibrated correctly, but the DVDs looked incredible on my living room Panny. This is, however, only regarding the colour timing. All other issues are obviously still present. |
SPOILERS ALERT IF YOU NEVER SAW THE MOVIES!!!!
I just read something very interesting about Force Ghost: Quote:
Do you think Qui-Gon's death scene might be "updated" on the Blu-rays? |
Unfortunately its a cut scene, but at least we get to see it.
|
Quote:
Let's try one. A New Hope is showing 119 minutes. 119 x 1.04 = 123.76 or 124 if rounded. Same time as the NTSC DVD. Depending on how the original and re-calcuated times are rounded, they could be off by a minute and none of them are off by more than that. The UK PAL times are all consistent with the US DVD run times. |
Quote:
122 x 1.04 = 126.88, off by anywhere from 2.12 to 2.61 minutes... Why do you have to add time to PAL? You could just as easily take time away from NTSC. It's just a matter of what format the video was originally encoded in. In the case of Star Wars, wouldn't it be NTSC? |
Quote:
I'm just starting with the PAL times since that's what the UK cover is showing. I'm converting it back to what it should be for comparison. |
Quote:
Silly me... |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 10:42 PM. |