![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If all it took was training and hard work, then that would negate the whole "force sensitive" and the "Force runs strong in my family" ideas. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
I don't see them as mutually exclusive, just a sign of Anakin's unusual nature/conception being passed on to his children. It hasn't been close to established that such inheritance is common to other Jedi or not, has it? |
Actually the no marriage thing makes a lot of sense.
They'd probably tend to fall in love with each other and after a few generations what would you have - European Royal families with really strong force powers. They'd be better off with Palpatine. |
Question??
In ROTJ when luke surrenders to vader, luke tells him to come with him to which vader replies:
"OBI-WAN ONCE THOUGHT AS YOU DO, YOU DON'T KNOW THE POWER OF THE DARKSIDE,I MUST OBEY MY MASTER." When? in the previous episodes did obi-wan ever tell vader to come with him, did i miss something??:confused: |
Quote:
|
Here is the picasaweb site for the Empire changes if anybody is interested-
https://picasaweb.google.com/doubleo...004ChangesESB# |
Quote:
It all depends on the "point of view" taken here. ;) The force, as it is presented in the OT, to some extent or another seems like it's something that can be learned by "anyone". Obi Wan describes it as binding everything together, etc. If the force is "all around us" (as Obi Wan puts it), then why does that mean only certain people can manipulate it? Why are there limits on who can be trained? About the only thing that really in any way contradicts this or suggests that some individuals are more "special" in their force-wielding potential in the OT is the whole notion that the force "runs strong" in Luke's family... but of course that concept gets blown right out the window in the PT due to the whole Jedi can't marry/have kids thing. Frankly, even though it wasn't 100% clear in the OT, the whole introduction of the midichlorians in the PT just raises more questions about the force than it answers. According to Star Wars Wookieepedia on the subject: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Midi-chlorian Quote:
People with lower counts can still train to be as good as those with higher counts (the minimum required isn't specified, but since all life apparently has at least some amount of them, it implies at least some very small amount of potential in all living things.... of course I'm sure the Jedi look for those with the higher count to give them the initial advantage, kind of like being really tall and playing basketball. It doesn't mean that a shorter person can't train really hard and hold his own on the court, it's just that he has an initial distinct disadvantage). While maybe not necessarily all people/being can truly become Jedi (just as not everybody in real life will have what it takes to become a professional athlete, even if they train really hard), learning is still a very, very important factor, and under the right circumstances can be used by those who would seem to be far less likely to be a potential Jedi. http://i258.photobucket.com/albums/h...oreyouknow.jpg |
Quote:
If it is not inherited (either it just isn't how the Force works or the Jedi don't procreate), then Jedi just pop out of nowhere for no reason:) |
Quote:
Quote:
In either case, they still need the 'nuture' for the 'nature.' Also a lot like the Bene Gesserit... :whistle: |
Rolling Stones 1999 Jar Jar Binks Cover Story
The link should serve as a reminder to everyone that Episode 1 was initially being received well by critics and fans alike, until it became the popular thing to hate on it. |
Quote:
"You see? You can do it!" -Obi Wan Kenobi Notice this isn't "You see? It's in your blood!" Point made, exit stage left. |
Quote:
"The Force is strong in my family. My father has it...I have it...and...my sister has it." Now that clearly implies that abilities can run in a family. Does it make it the only way? No, but it's far more specific than a vague Obi Wan line to Luke which could be construed as nothing more than encouragement for him to keep further discovering his ability. |
Quote:
|
Indeed, Luke had exceptional abilities even before training. As the previous poster stated, kind of like Potter and his abilities before becoming a Wizard.
He used to bullseye wamp rats in his T-16. |
Quote:
Here's the first line from the Rolling Stone review linked to in that article... "The actors are wallpaper, the jokes are juvenile, there's no romance, and the dialogue lands with the thud of a computer-instruction manual". I guess that could be considered being received well. From a certain point of view;) |
Roger Ebert's positive review took a very similar tone.
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/...905170301/1023 Set against awesome backdrops, the characters in "The Phantom Menace" inhabit a plot that is little more complex than the stories I grew up on in science-fiction magazines. The whole series sometimes feel like a cover from Thrilling Wonder Stories, come to life. The dialogue is pretty flat and straightforward, although seasoned with a little quasi-classical formality, as if the characters had read but not retained "Julius Caesar." I wish the "Star Wars" characters spoke with more elegance and wit (as Gore Vidal's Greeks and Romans do), but dialogue isn't the point, anyway: These movies are about new things to look at. A perfectly legitimate position (and one that could fairly be applied to A Ne - I can't do it - Star Wars) but hardly a ringing endorsement. He also touched on this whole question of its reception at the time. If it were the first "Star Wars" movie, "The Phantom Menace" would be hailed as a visionary breakthrough. But this is the fourth movie of the famous series, and we think we know the territory; many of the early reviews have been blase, paying lip service to the visuals and wondering why the characters aren't better developed. How quickly do we grow accustomed to wonders. It would seem the initial reception was at best mixed, no? It was certainly mixed enough that he felt compelled to open his own review by addressing it. And again, the opening line has something of a damning with faint praise quality to it. Isn't he basically saying 'people would be going nuts over this stuff if they hadn't already seen it three times'? *shrug* |
Quote:
The first few lines of the article I posted are as follows: Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:49 PM. |