Quote:
Originally Posted by kurtlingle
(Post 4524051)
Man,
This thread is tough - I love SW - my favorite series and I love BOTH Trilogies. I guess this is just the way it is - with the back and forth.
I think there should be a SW argument thread - and all this stuff goes there. But then this thread would only have 200-300 posts?
I am glad to see the "pro" PT posts - as I love those movies and hate when they get bashed by SW fans. All the movies make one awesome story with cool stuff like Lightsabers, jedi vs sith, DV, etc, etc. GL did an amazing thing with these movies and I can't wait to see them ALL in HD!
|
In the end, I just don't care anymore. You often find out that they really haven't even paid attention to the things going on in the PT, and then they come on trashing them. We have had these things happen numerous times on here.
Sure, they are not perfect, but they sure are a gazillion times better than nostalgic UOT fans make them out to be.
Nothing could ever have met their expectations. NOTHING!
Quote:
Originally Posted by P@t_Mtl
(Post 4524194)
Episode 3 is the best of the prequel for me. It had everything in it that make's Star Wars great, including the silly moments that seem to make some go nuts :) The originals had their fair share of silly moments as well so I think the balance is there in the end.
Episode 3 could have done better but after 6 years of complaint by some fans it really just had a hard time recovering. It's too bad since it's a good movie.
|
It should have broken records!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay444
(Post 4524242)
I agree with you 100%. It was a very very good film and easily (imo) the best of the 3 PT films. I didn't much care for the "NOOOO!!" at the end, but whatever, everything else was well done. I think that might be the biggest issue a lot of the OT fan have, is they wanted more of a connection between the PT and OT. What I think a lot of people wanted was to see Darth Vader kickin' Jedi @$$ for 3 films and what they got wasn't what they had imagined over the 16 year wait between films (ya know, Vader appearing only at the end of Episode 3). Thus lots were disappointed. But I am def agree with you, ROTS was a good time!
|
Absolutely, they wanted to see SW just like the old ones, but George put everything upside down. I, for one, am happy that George didn't show a bada$$ Anakin/Vader...
Quote:
Originally Posted by chip75
(Post 4524481)
I think a lot of fans criticisms arise because they/we treat the original trilogy as source material. It's easy for an Ian Flemming fan to say they dislike how the Bond movies are made because they detract or deviate from the source material i.e. the novels. It's harder for Star Wars fans because the source material changes daily i.e. George Lucas's brain. We regard the Yoda Ep. IV puppet as source material while infact it's just a prop made to the best of the abilities of the modellers and puppeteers of the day....
|
Yes, absolutely. Lucas had to work within the limitations of the time, besides the fact that he was pushing it to the limits...
The OT would have looked very different then what they ended up looking, due to the limitations. I am sure many UOT fanatics say that's a good thin, but I would have liked to see his full visions brought to life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu Tide
(Post 4524718)
I may be mistaken, but I remember hearing that Speilberg actually directed some of the scenes in ROTS.
|
Nah, Lucas was just saying so that he could make Steven responsible that George wanted to have changed etc. It was basically a joke. It's on the ROTS DVD, I believe in the "Within One Minute" documentary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by P@t_Mtl
(Post 4524844)
her and Anakin were already slaves, they were lost by Gondola the Hutt (or whatever the name was :D can't look it up now) to Watto in a podrace bet. She did not place the bet. From what I can see she was a slave long before and Anakin was born as a slave.
|
And you call yourself a SW fan!?!?!?? ;)
I am not amused! :p
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndefinentBlu
(Post 4524859)
I think the name is Gardulla The Hutt.
Besides she won freedom when Cliegg Lars freed her and married her sadly though one day she went to pick mushrooms that grow on the moisture vaporators and never returned.
|
Yes. You are a true SW fan. :) :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay444
(Post 4524903)
I am not in anyway picking on you, just a head's up before you read further, okay?
But this is sort of silly. I mean, those lightsabers are only on screen for a few seconds. This is the type of microscopic subjection the OT never had to go through because the technology back in the day didn't exit to 'freeze frame' at such a high resolution. There are gaffs in EVERY movie and this stuff is hardly noticable when watching the film in action. So, I would ask the original writer of that article: "Who cares?" Dude needs to go outside..lol.
There is a gaff in Return of the Jedi too. Well, not sure if its a gaff or Harrison Ford was just lucky, but.... Han grabs Leia's boob after she is shot in Return of the Jedi. Yup, even Harrison Ford could not resist after seeing the Bikini in the first half of the film...LOL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OG Pooh
(Post 4525790)
I think they (I mean GL) would have been better off had he maybe only touched on Anakin as a boy, just so we knew his background. Possibly the opening act of Episode I, with the rest of the 1st film being what ended up AotC. Then Epsiode II should have concentrated on the Clone Wars. Outside of the TV series, we never really seen much of Anakin as a Jedi or as Obi-Wan's so called Brother. It was, here's a kid, now he's a Jedi, now he's a Sith.
|
100% agreed.
Even in the pics I couldn't see the flaws.
This is just ridiculous nit-picking.
Some people have way too much free time on their hands. :rolleyes: