Blu-ray Forum

Blu-ray Forum (http://forum.blu-ray.com/index.php)
-   Insider Discussion (http://forum.blu-ray.com/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   "Club Penton" - Ask questions to Hollywood insider "Penton-Man" (http://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=31882)

cjamescook 06-11-2009 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Objectivity (Post 1998609)
...Getting back on topic, is there any wonder why so few American companies make electronics any more? That union markup makes it impossible to sell a competitive product.

Today's trivia question: Does anyone remember one of the principal reasons for HDTV?

Answer: Work on an American standard for high-definition TV was initiated under the theory that it would give a shot in the arm to the declining American TV manufacturing sector. Specifically, because the standard was to be originated in America, it was seen as giving them an advantage. At the time, the main competition was the Japanese MUSE standard.

Penton-Man 06-11-2009 05:19 PM

I just love news from vendors intended for professional filmmakers recently like this coming out of Kodak (the film people) and Arri (primarily known for its film cameras) because it surely drives the screenshot scientists who have a religious aversion to even the thought of any type of digital processing/enhancement………..just absolutely bonkers! :D
Michel, I can just envision you runnin to the bathroom right now.

http://www.postproductionbuyersguide...k_05_20_09.php
"With KODAK Motion Compensated Grain Management harnessing the CUDA™ computational processing power of the da Vinci R-series, colorists will reduce grain and sharpen images to extract all the richness and information of film after being scanned to digital images."

http://news.creativecow.net/story/862010
“In the last decade, film post production has been reinvented by the application of digital tools to the color correction and finishing process. Relativity™ takes the DI process to another level, providing interactive control of grain and texture, plus motion effects.” says Glenn Kennel, Chief Technology Officer for ARRI Inc.”

PeterTHX 06-11-2009 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josh (Post 1999245)
Apple is a closed system because that is the only way you can pretty much guarantee that its going to work. I have built too many PCs where one part doesn't play nice with another part simply because two different manufacturers didn't follow specs perfectly. Its annoying to spend that much money only to find after months of research and tech support that the reason for that random BSOD is hardware related!

Except these days it's pretty rare. Sure, maybe in the older days of IRQ sharing/Win95, etc.

As long as you buy decent hardware it's not an issue. I can build a modest system, a medium price, and a balls-out premium system and have them all work on first boot. You cannot "build" an Apple. You can upgrade some hardware, but that's it.

Quote:

They should really should chance their slogan to "Apple: It just works." because that is exactly how I felt when it took 5 seconds to sync my Apple laptop to the Apple Airport... compared to the 15 minutes it took when dealing with PCs.
Except Apple's true slogan is "no competition", you pay the price they set.

Sync? As in connecting to a network? With Vista, you see the "Wireless Networks Available" icon, click, enter WPA2 password and done, with the option of "always connect" so there's no reconnection hassle on reboot.

Doctorossi 06-11-2009 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Penton-Man (Post 1999489)
reduce grain and sharpen images to extract all the richness and information of film

:panic: Fire up the nerdrage amplifiers, boys!






:popcorn:

Penton-Man 06-11-2009 05:26 PM

On an unprocessed note, how are people finding that little known and talked about Blu-ray The International ?

Can anyone differentiate the 70mm captured scenes from the 35mm?
I gave some hints about that back when the film theatrically debuted.

P.S.
I see Martin got it right. :)
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/movies...69&show=review

Doctorossi 06-11-2009 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PeterTHX (Post 1999519)
Except Apple's true slogan is "no competition"

It is?! Then who are they number two to? A ghost?

Bobby Henderson 06-11-2009 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Kleist
Getting back on topic, is there any wonder why so few American companies make electronics any more? That union markup makes it impossible to sell a competitive product.

While I agree Union demands really got out of control in many manufacturing sectors (and remain out of control in other areas like education), there's a lot more to why jobs leave the United States for sites in Mexico or even Asia.

Workers comp insurance is one of the biggest factors pushing companies to outsource jobs overseas. I contend it's an even bigger factor than union issues.

Many businesses have the option whether or not to provide benefits like employer provided health insurance coverage. Most small businesses no longer do so because of the outrageously high costs of the health insurance premiums. However, workers comp is not optional. You have to carry that on any employee legally on the books. Workers comp premium costs are tied directly to health care inflation, which remains very high. Even if you hire a person at minimum wage and are making the minimum in matching social security and medicare payments you may still end up getting bent over on the workers comp premiums for that entry level employee. As a result more and more large businesses are sending jobs overseas. And a growing number of small businesses are paying employees off the books, cash under table. There is a lot more than millions of migrants from Mexico working in the underground economy; millions of legal American citizens are working the same way as well.

Oklahoma is a right to work state and by all logic should have a lot more in the way of non-union manufacturing plants. The state's backward worker's comp system does a lot to keep many heavy industries from locating here.

In the end, China and other countries in SE Asia can mass produce electronics so much cheaper than anyone in the US could ever manage -even if you paid every worker in the plant minimum wage. They would still be making a lot more money than workers across the Pacific. So the "if unions weren't around" argument really doesn't work.

Add to that the safety and environmental regulations we have in the United States. China and most other countries in Asia have next to nothing in terms of those kinds of regulations. They're basically where we were in the late 1800s during the industrial revolution: rivers so polluted they catch on fire and young children working in sweat shops or even coal mines.

Do we really want to compete with countries like China by sinking way back down to that filthy, dangerous level and paying everyone who doesn't own their own business poverty wages? Or do we want to figure out a different solution? I think the bean counters wouldn't mind seeing us revert to late 1800s standards.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cjamescook
Work on an American standard for high-definition TV was initiated under the theory that it would give a shot in the arm to the declining American TV manufacturing sector. Specifically, because the standard was to be originated in America, it was seen as giving them an advantage. At the time, the main competition was the Japanese MUSE standard.

That's kind of ironic because it was during the late 1970s when Japanese electronics companies were "dumping" millions of TVs into the US market at prices well below the cost it took to manufacture them. In 1975 the US had a couple dozen TV manufacturing companies. By 1980, Zenith and RCA were the only ones left. RCA was bought out by Phillips in France; a few years later their last American TV plant in Indiana closed. Zenith moved its manufacturing offshore.

American politicians often let large overseas businesses do whatever they want, including breaking just about any trade rule on the books, in return for diplomatic favors. We basically gave most of our electronics industry away to Japanese companies in return for a commitment the country wouldn't become a Soviet satellite with warm water ocean ports.

Doctorossi 06-11-2009 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Penton-Man (Post 1999521)
On an unprocessed note, how are people finding that little known and talked about Blu-ray The International ?

Nothing frightens me off of some nice 70mm cinematography quite like a lousy script!

juanell 06-11-2009 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Penton-Man (Post 1999521)
On an unprocessed note, how are people finding that little known and talked about Blu-ray The International ?

Can anyone differentiate the 70mm captured scenes from the 35mm?
I gave some hints about that back when the film theatrically debuted.

P.S.
I see Martin got it right. :)

I could tell the slightest difference, the 70mm seems to be confined to still exterior shots of buildings. Martins final words in his review sum up my feelings Exactly. Very happy with this release.

Penton-Man 06-11-2009 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doctorossi (Post 1999545)
Nothing frightens me off of some nice 70mm cinematography quite like a lousy script!

lol ^
Lousy script my arse........at least they're writing and producing rather than "banging forehead against monitor".

Penton-Man 06-11-2009 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by juanell (Post 1999653)
I could tell the slightest difference, the 70mm seems to be confined to still exterior shots of buildings. Martins final words in his review sum up my feelings Exactly. Very happy with this release.

You got a good eye and good home theater equipment. :)

Doctorossi 06-11-2009 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Penton-Man (Post 1999716)
at least they're writing and producing rather than "banging forehead against monitor".

Ah, the old "more is more" argument with a subtle "a legitimate arbiter of a practice must be popularly deemed sufficiently accomplished at that practice" subtext. Time-honored. *ahem*

And, incidentally, for those without immediate personal experience of same:

"banging forehead against monitor" = writing and producing :whip:




And, for the record, I certainly take nothing away from anyone who has achieved the difficult task of managing to get a film made today. This recognition of effort, however, is no guarantee that I will enjoy the product.

juanell 06-11-2009 06:25 PM

Ill own up to decent on both.Sony bdp s-1 to 46" xbr2 at 2 1/2 ph.what i dont get is how they match the 35mm footage to the 70mm so well, assuming that the 70mm footage was not dumbed down.

Alan Gordon 06-11-2009 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobby Henderson (Post 1999536)
RCA was bought out by Phillips in France;

Weren't they bought out by Thomson?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Penton-Man (Post 1999521)
On an unprocessed note, how are people finding that little known and talked about Blu-ray The International ?

The plot seemed interesting to me, and kudos to Sony on their theatrical release timing (with all the bank issues going on in the real world), but it was low on my totem pole right now with upgrading my speakers, AVR (lossless, baby!), and of course Blu-ray sets of "Burn Notice", "Lost", and "Ghostbusters" next week...

~Alan

Jeff Kleist 06-11-2009 06:36 PM

Hey Bobby, I think you quoted the quote I was quoting :)

I saw international theatrically, and yes picked up on the increase in res/finer grain then :) I haven't gotten the Blu-ray yet, too many other things on my plate at the moment :( I'm sure it's excellent

Oliver K 06-11-2009 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Penton-Man (Post 1999521)
On an unprocessed note, how are people finding that little known and talked about Blu-ray The International ?

Can anyone differentiate the 70mm captured scenes from the 35mm?
I gave some hints about that back when the film theatrically debuted.

P.S.
I see Martin got it right. :)
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/movies...69&show=review

Another stellar Blu-Ray from Sony - very impressed. Although all of the movie looks very nice the 65mm scenes really look stunning. Still it is hard to really compare them to the rest of the movie that is shot in 35mm as the cameras were not used in an alternating fashion for comparable scenes.

I especially liked the scenes in Istanbul and Mailand - now how about a complete movie shot in 65 ? :)

Penton-Man 06-11-2009 09:46 PM

The movie :) ……..
http://www.everybodypays.com/

was inspired by this scandal -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_Credit_and_Commerce_International

Another favorite of mine debuting this week on Blu-ray was Gran Torino :) which has a decidedly different *look* to the imagery.

cjamescook 06-11-2009 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver K (Post 2000250)
... I especially liked the scenes in Istanbul and Mailand - now how about a complete movie shot in 65 ? :)

Well, you can always look for movies on this list to be released on Blu-ray.

Of course, there's this other list of films shot in Vistavision.

mikey p 06-11-2009 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Penton-Man (Post 2000439)
The movie :) ……..
http://www.everybodypays.com/

was inspired by this scandal -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_Credit_and_Commerce_International

Another favorite of mine debuting this week on Blu-ray was Gran Torino :) which has a decidedly different *look* to the imagery.

Looking forward to watching both, maybe this weekend. Neat stuff :)

On a off topic funny today, panny released firmware up date for the old BD30 STB players, (I have 2) on the screen cap site they were bit*hing that panny server was running the d/l so slow they were trying to get some one to put up a mirror site, funny in fact for a "dead format waiting to happen" doom and gloom experts. Thanks sorry I could not help myself. :D

Oliver K 06-12-2009 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cjamescook (Post 2000588)
Well, you can always look for movies on this list to be released on Blu-ray.

Of course, there's this other list of films shot in Vistavision.

I am aware of these movies but I am waiting for a new production. I very much appreciate the efforts by Ron Fricke with Samsara, but what I would also like to see is one of the big studios doing a production where the majority of the movie is shot in 65mm.

But this is not to take away from The International - I am happy that 65mm was used at all in that production. Still I would like to know how much more it would have cost to shoot The International entirely in 65mm.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:11 AM.