Blu-ray Forum

Blu-ray Forum (http://forum.blu-ray.com/index.php)
-   Insider Discussion (http://forum.blu-ray.com/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   "Club Penton" - Ask questions to Hollywood insider "Penton-Man" (http://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=31882)

Jeff Kleist 01-06-2010 02:45 AM

Quote:

Jeff, are you suggesting all notebook computers across the board lack the processing horsepower to play a Blu-ray movie properly? If that's the case, I disagree.

An entry level notebook with the minimal amount of RAM and integrated graphics may have some issues with Blu-ray playback. However, a well-equipped notebook with a current dual-core or quad core CPU, 4GB or more RAM and a real video card is not going to have a problem. Blu-ray playback is not the most compute-intensive task one can throw at a notebook.

That being said, if I were going to play a Blu-ray movie on a notebook computer I would do so with the notebook placed on a stable surface. Not my lap. And I would have it plugged into wall outlet power. I do that anyway when using professional graphics applications.
I'm not saying they can't, I'm saying that you shouldn't. Notebooks are simply not designed for continual heavy duty usage. It's also more heavy duty than you think, because many (not ALL) lack the proper chipsets to offload to the GPU.

The amount of money you have to pay to get decent performance, you can build 3 of an equivlanet desktop. So like I said, buy a good desktop, buy a netbook that'll run your digital copies and go home happy :)

jdc115 01-06-2010 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpaceDog (Post 2735610)
Am I right to assume there isn't quite as much oversight outside the US for animal treatment in film? I've grown so accustomed to the "no animals were harmed tag" that I've never even noticed if they aren't present in foreign productions.
This should be a standard worldwide.

Then Old Boy would fail for the Octopus scene. He ended up doing 7 takes according to this:

http://youniversemovie.blogspot.com/...ing-scene.html

I don't think it is carried in foreign films as it is a certification by the American Human society for domestically filmed Screen Actor Guild productions:

All domestically filmed Screen Actors Guild (SAG) productions are required to provide our Safety Representatives unlimited on-set access whenever animals are used. During pre-production, we review the script to determine the intensity of the planned animal action. Safety Representatives then monitor the animals during principal photography to ensure their safety and well-being. If a production meets or exceeds our rigorous standards, the film earns a Monitored: Outstanding rating and the “No Animals Were Harmed”® disclaimer, which appears in the end credits of the film.

source: http://www.americanhumane.org/protec...ng-system.html

Mr. Cinema 01-06-2010 08:22 AM

Why are some of Sony's new digital copies ONLY available for the PSP? I don't own a PSP and never will own a PSP. I do, however, own a laptop, which holds my digital copies. This is not a good idea, imo. I noticed this on Godzilla and Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs. I'm guessing there may be/will be others.

Penton-Man 01-06-2010 04:26 PM

This is Crystal filling in for penton-man.
He asked me to post this onto members here yesterday as he was running out of the office to catch a jet but I got busy with things in Culver City so it slipped my mind.

Re: 3D on TV-
http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.co...ision-channel/

http://www.thrfeed.com/2010/01/espn-...n-network.html

Today he wanted to remind forum members that if all goes well, Sony is streaming our CES 2010 press conference at 4:15 p.m. P.S.T. live on the Internet which will be available at the following urls:
http://ces.cnet.com/liveatces
and
http://www.ustream.tv/sonyelectronics

After which – if Arsenal plays well- he is hoping to inform Sir Howard (a big Man U supporter) that Arsenal has captured second place in the Premier league and leapfrogged over Manchister United in the process.

Uxi 01-06-2010 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Kleist (Post 2727035)
"Let them eat iTunes" is the last word unless there's been a major breakthrough.

Does Apple even participate in BDA? WTH? :mad:

A Macbook Pro should be more than capable of handling Blu-ray and handling it well.

Course, I've always scoffed at netbooks since a decent smartphone can do their job and perform others while taking good care of other duties (point & shoot camera, multimedia player, etc).

PeterTHX 01-06-2010 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uxi (Post 2739841)
Does Apple even participate in BDA? WTH? :mad:

They only joined to spite Microsoft being behind HD DVD.

Otherwise they see it as a competitor to iTunes/AppleTV HD downloads.

PeterTHX 01-06-2010 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Penton-Man (Post 2739791)
This is Crystal filling in for penton-man.
He asked me to post this onto members here yesterday as he was running out of the office to catch a jet but I got busy with things in Culver City so it slipped my mind.

Picture of bolded action:
http://popcornandasoda.files.wordpre...e-still-81.jpg

:D

Jeff Kleist 01-06-2010 05:05 PM

Apple does own a lot of patents in AVC

Apple would have to redesign their boards to implement the secure pathways, but yes, there's no reason why Apple's hardware can't handle it. I hope that potential antitrust issues in the EU will finally just get them to license their DRM out and enjoy the massive income it'd bring from having every managed copy device paying them a few bucks for the privlege to rip to their format (but I know they'd rather get a check from the studios every time you push that button and maintain monopoly control over their tech). They're already mad enough that the EU will foil their non-removeable battery scam soon enough ($5 for the battery, and $60 in Apple's pocket to put it in for you, $50/$100 for the new laptop racket)

Netbook doesn't carrry huge bills attached it it, has much more storage and a useable keyboard. Smartphones also lack the accessories or a decent size screen. Even the best make extended browsing a pain that a netbook does in a snap.

DenonCI 01-06-2010 07:03 PM

Penton,

Did you see/hear Don Edlund from Sony Pictures on "Home Theater Geeks?" http://twit.tv/htg

sharkshark 01-06-2010 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Penton-Man (Post 2739791)
This is Crystal filling in for penton-man.

Hi, Crystal.

Quote:

Today he wanted to remind forum members that if all goes well, Sony is streaming our CES 2010 press conference at 4:15 p.m. P.S.T. live on the Internet which will be available at the following urls:
http://ces.cnet.com/liveatces
and
http://www.ustream.tv/sonyelectronics
So, will Penton be on TV?

Tell him I bought District 9 on BD today becasue he just wouldn't shuttup about it...

Quote:

After which – if Arsenal plays well- he is hoping to inform Sir Howard (a big Man U supporter) that Arsenal has captured second place in the Premier league and leapfrogged over Manchister United in the process.
If he hasn't heard already, it's postponed because of Snow.

http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-arc...n-announcement

Proving, again, that the brits are wimps... :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxSbWC_lK-E

I kid, naturally, and hope the Boltan bastards go down, and hard.

Happy CES, everybody at Sony...

sharkshark 01-06-2010 11:23 PM

- Oh, my...it just started with Jimi H in from Woodstock 3D. Insane.

- Taylor Swift no less...

Jeff Kleist 01-06-2010 11:30 PM

Sony did brought another guitarist back to life 2 years ago. 3D hologram, no glasses!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAfgarsODf0

Go forward to 3:30

That was from an SD videotape source, instead of the 35mm they probably got hendrix from :)

sharkshark 01-07-2010 12:09 AM

well, 16>35>HD, but, yeah...

OK, Zoolander jokes... I've gotta give up the monkey. Hope Penton you were one of the execs 'smiling with your eyes'

cipher 01-07-2010 06:38 AM

Just updated my annual year-end Blu-Ray technology analysis thread with 2009 data.

However, here's the summary tables for those who rarely venture outside this thread...

Code:

Studios      Disc Size  |      Audio      |      Video
          BD25    BD50  |  Lossy  Lossless |  MPEG2  AVC/VC1

All-time  36.95  63.05 |  19.10  80.90  |  12.44    87.56
2009      27.55  72.46 |  10.10  89.90  |  1.75    98.25

Code:

Studio            BD50          |      Lossless      |        MPEG2
                          All-        |              All-  |                All-
            2009  2008  Time  | 2009  2008  time  | 2009  2008    time

Disney      93.33  100    82.35  | 100    100    100    | 0      0      11.11
Sony        91.76  90.91  77.40  | 98.91  100    99.64  | 1.1    1.27    26.82
Paramount   88.89  94.87  69.44  | 98.63  97.44  76.03  | 0      0      31.94
Universal  86.49  69.23  69.23  | 96.15  100    97.50  | 0      0      0
Fox        80.72  83.05  61.82  | 100    100    100    | 1.2    5.26    30.56
MGM        73.33  64.29  47.62  | 100    100    100    | 29.03  21.43  38.10
Other            57.87  34.10  56.62  | 81.88  66.37  72.30  | 0.7    14.20  13.50
Lionsgate  55.56  63.64  50.00  | 100    100    79.21  | 0      0      32.69
Warner      55.20  55.34  58.01  | 76.34  52.73  56.70  | 0      1      3.92

I guess 2010 is the year Warner decides to go all lossless? Ouch.

Jeff Kleist 01-07-2010 05:25 PM

Quote:

You know me too well.
That provocation might actually produce much more than a “dirty look”……..more like an Encounter of the Fourth Kind.
Plane ticket to Vegas- $400
Society For The Promotion Of Coyote Abuse T-shirt- $15
Foolproof master plan to unmask the Penton Man....priceless

:)

neo_reloaded 01-07-2010 06:36 PM

The Warner titles without lossless were almost exclusively TV shows and direct-to-DVD/BD releases. All theatrical films, new and catalogue, have been getting lossless.

Alan Gordon 01-07-2010 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neo_reloaded (Post 2746587)
The Warner titles without lossless were almost exclusively TV shows and direct-to-DVD/BD releases. All theatrical films, new and catalogue, have been getting lossless.

There are quite a few titles on the list from WB without "lossless" that were worth seeing, and quite a few of which that were NOT TV shows, or direct-to-BD releases.

I'd make a list, but I'm busy right now. However, check out the WB titles listed here:

Blu-ray Movies - Warner Bros.

Some of the movies were Oscar nominated/Oscar winners.

~Alan

neo_reloaded 01-07-2010 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Gordon (Post 2746704)
There are quite a few titles on the list from WB without "lossless" that were worth seeing, and quite a few of which that were NOT TV shows, or direct-to-BD releases.

I'd make a list, but I'm busy right now. However, check out the WB titles listed here:

Blu-ray Movies - Warner Bros.

Some of the movies were Oscar nominated/Oscar winners.

~Alan

Maybe I should be clearer - I meant for WB titles released in 2009, the titles without lossless were direct-to-dvd or tv shows.

Alan Gordon 01-07-2010 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neo_reloaded (Post 2747301)
Maybe I should be clearer - I meant for WB titles released in 2009, the titles without lossless were direct-to-dvd or tv shows.

Aside from a couple of classic released in "lossy" mono, and "Nights In Rodanthe", you are correct.

~Alan

Uxi 01-08-2010 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Kleist (Post 2740017)
Apple does own a lot of patents in AVC

Apple would have to redesign their boards to implement the secure pathways, but yes, there's no reason why Apple's hardware can't handle it. I hope that potential antitrust issues in the EU will finally just get them to license their DRM out and enjoy the massive income it'd bring from having every managed copy device paying them a few bucks for the privlege to rip to their format (but I know they'd rather get a check from the studios every time you push that button and maintain monopoly control over their tech). They're already mad enough that the EU will foil their non-removeable battery scam soon enough ($5 for the battery, and $60 in Apple's pocket to put it in for you, $50/$100 for the new laptop racket)

The rest of BDA doesn't care? I mean aren't they a member of the board? Do they not actually participate?

The lawsuit with Nokia should be interesting, too.

But the unibody Macbook Pros and new iMacs already have end to end HDCP, don't they? I could see backward compatibility on older models, but for the new stuff, IIRC, they already have iTunes up to date with mentions of Blu-ray in the EULA and the hardware appears up to snuff... so all that's left is the will and desire for BTO options for the appropriate hardware....

Quote:

Netbook doesn't carrry huge bills attached it it, has much more storage and a useable keyboard. Smartphones also lack the accessories or a decent size screen. Even the best make extended browsing a pain that a netbook does in a snap.
Eh, Nokia has been doing AV-out cables through the 3.5mm jack for a few years now. As far as browsing, you obviously haven't browsed through an N900. It is identical to the desktop experience. I generally scorn netbooks, though. If my smartphone can't do something, that's what my Macbook Pro is for.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:38 PM.