Originally Posted by Pfreddy
Yeah, I agree. It wasn't nearly as good in 3D as the first one. It was solid but nothing I'd call immersive. Actually to be honest, I was a bit disappointed by the 3D in the theater. It had limited pop, but also limited depth and layer separation. YMMV though, as it seems everyone sees 3D differently!!
It's true, two people see the same movie in 3D and neither one agrees on what they thought of the 3D.
I agree with what you're saying though for the most part in that this movie could've pushed it more by separating the 3D cameras more. Or was this post 3D?