| Site locale: United States |
|
||||
|
||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Deals |
Best Blu-ray Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
Price drops
|
![]() $4.99 | ![]() $32.36 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $24.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $14.26 | ![]() $21.99 | ![]() $7.96 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $5.00 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $13.99 |
|
|
#561 |
|
Active Member
|
Add me to the people who found the PQ good enough, especially after reading that bit about Content Zone having problems with the DI. Not being an expert on DNR and stuff like that (forever a noob~
Packaging is nice, but doesn't seem as sturdy as the digibooks from WB. Overall, I'm satisfied. It's just nice to see so many new people get to enjoy this awesome movie. Still shocked it never got a R1 release on DVD (along with My Sassy Girl). |
|
|
|
#562 |
|
Member
|
Could anyone who watched the entire film confirm if the English subtitles are standard and not SDH (subtitled for the deaf and hard of hearing)?
I've read a few pages back and the only comment on them is from a user who only watched the first 10 minutes. Sorry to harp on it, but not having SDH subs is the main requirement for me and I need to be 100% positive considering the price of this thing. Thanks! Last edited by Iron_Lung; 09-11-2011 at 07:19 AM. Reason: typo! |
|
|
|
#563 |
|
Expert Member
Jan 2011
|
They're standard
|
|
|
|
#565 |
|
Member
|
Heh, whoops. Yeah I guess the dead wouldn't need subs. Thanks for the conformation guys.
|
|
|
|
#566 |
|
Contributor
|
Received and watched my copy the other day... I thought the transfer was fine, sure it is not the best I have seen, but it represents the film adequately and is certainly an improvement over the DVD! The subs had a few spelling or grammatical errors, but are definitely not Hard of Hearing.
|
|
|
|
#567 | |
|
Member
Jun 2011
|
Quote:
Agree, it's not demo picture material but it's far from a disaster, better than the SD DVD, scrubbed a bit too much but not annoying at all in my eyes. Do I wish it was a better transfer, yes, I am sure most would, would I buy it after seeing the quality of the transfer. Yes. And I do have quite a few that I wound why I even bought the Blu when I have the DVD. |
|
|
|
|
#568 | ||||
|
Power Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
#569 |
|
Active Member
Nov 2010
|
I'd like to chime in and say this Blu-ray is a decent improvement of the DVD. However, if you have an HD front projector, the difference is night and day. The DVD is barely watchable on a 100" screen, while the Blu-ray looks just as good as it does on a flat panel HDTV. Definitely a must-buy for me.
|
|
|
|
#570 |
|
Contributor
|
There appears to be more difference in the color timing and contrast of this disc as opposed to DNR, which I honestly didn't see much use of. The image is definitely more washed out than the other editions judging by screencaps (which is a bad idea), but it appears the brightness knob simply went up a lot with this release. I did notice a fair amount of grain.
"You might very well think that; I couldn't possibly comment."
|
|
|
|
#571 |
|
Active Member
|
Hey guys, I'm trying to decide between the regular edition and the "coffeebook" edition. What are the sizes of each case? Is the regular edition the same size (length and height) as a regular Blu-ray case, so it won't stick out from the shelf? (The Battle Royale Blu-ray was DVD-size, so it stood out.) What about the "coffeebook" edition? Is it the size of a regular Blu-ray case, or a digibook case, or DVD, etc? Thanks, guys!
|
|
|
|
#572 |
|
Active Member
Feb 2010
Saint-Petersburg, Russia
|
It has exactly the same size as Warner's DigiBooks. Slightly (4-5 mm) higher than CJ Collection that in turns is slightly higher than regular case. But of course much lower than DVD case.
BDs: 1073
Criterion: 117, Eureka: 27, BFI: 17, CJ Entertainment: 13, Kino: 12, Artificial Eye: 7 |
|
|
|
#573 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#576 | |
|
Active Member
|
Quote:
To be honest, 1000 is still possible. It's still a niche title and expensive during the worst recession in many a decade. The other release also looks nice too and people have been debating about the PQ so it may not have flown out. |
|
|
|
|
#577 |
|
Member
|
Finally got around to watching this the other day. I thought the packaging was great.
The picture was quite good. One thing I hate about upconverted DVDs is the subtitles are always fuzzy, so that was a nice fix. I found the picture soft at times, but definitely more than satisfying. Can't wait to watch it on my new TV and sound system soon. Even with TV speakers, that last scene was great. |
|
|
|
#579 |
|
Expert Member
|
I just watched this for the first time, and i'm just totally hyped up. I feel like i could watch it again right now, 15 minutes after it finished. The music is such a huge deal in these contemporary Korean films, and this one is no different. Got a few good laughs out of it, too..albeit due to unintentionally funny moments.
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
| Monty Python: Meaning of Life vs Holy Grail vs Life of Brian | Movie Polls | FendersRule | 62 | 05-23-2013 01:42 AM |
| Went to Frys and heard a bitter HD-DVD fan moaning. | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | blu-backer | 50 | 11-20-2010 04:14 PM |
| Oh sweet ignorance!!! | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | DJeffries | 6 | 09-03-2007 03:00 AM |
| Sweet review | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | jedisinclair | 0 | 11-28-2006 02:46 AM |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|