Best Blu-ray Deals

Best Blu-ray Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | Price drops  All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Japan
Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (Blu-ray)
$4.99
Star Trek: Original Motion Picture Collection (Blu-ray)
$32.36
Valkyrie (Blu-ray)
$4.99
Sin City (Blu-ray)
$4.99
Sleeping with the Enemy (Blu-ray)
$4.99
Epic 3D (Blu-ray)
$24.99
21 Jump Street (Blu-ray)
$9.99
Dredd 3D (Blu-ray)
$14.26
Epic (Blu-ray)
$21.99
The Terminator (Blu-ray)
$7.96
American History X (Blu-ray)
$4.99
The Expendables 2 (Blu-ray)
$14.99
Trainspotting (Blu-ray)
$5.00
The Last Stand (Blu-ray)
$14.99
True Blood: The Complete Fifth Season (Blu-ray)
$34.99
A Time to Kill (Blu-ray)
$4.99
The Wedding Singer (Blu-ray)
$4.99
Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance (Blu-ray)
$9.99
LEGO Batman The Movie - DC Super Heroes Unite (Blu-ray)
$13.99

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-08-2013, 09:18 PM   #261
pro-bassoonist pro-bassoonist is online now
Blu-ray reviewer
 
pro-bassoonist's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
X
47
-
-
15
21
Default

Hi Kdo

The current transfer the Lionsgate release uses has blanket filtering, which is the reason why you feel that the film looks soft.

Compression is also very problematic. You don't even have to project the film to tell that there are very serious technical issues that could be easily addressed with a new transfer. And you do not have to have a 4K scan to see substantial improvements in quality. A 2K scan will also produce marvelous results.

There is no reason why this film couldn't look every bit as impressive as Total Recall (I refer to Canal/Lionsgate's new release). And you will be hugely satisfied with the upgrades on a nice 50'+ TV set.

I hope you are well

Pro-B
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 10:46 PM   #262
kdo kdo is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
kdo's Avatar
 
Mar 2010
USA
86
64
144
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist View Post
Hi Kdo

The current transfer the Lionsgate release uses has blanket filtering, which is the reason why you feel that the film looks soft.

Compression is also very problematic. You don't even have to project the film to tell that there are very serious technical issues that could be easily addressed with a new transfer. And you do not have to have a 4K scan to see substantial improvements in quality. A 2K scan will also produce marvelous results.

There is no reason why this film couldn't look every bit as impressive as Total Recall (I refer to Canal/Lionsgate's new release). And you will be hugely satisfied with the upgrades on a nice 50'+ TV set.

I hope you are well

Pro-B
I am well, thank you, and hope you are also my friend ...

Sorry, I can't really speak for "Total Recall," I've never owned it on Blu-ray (just not a big fan of the film in general), but I do remember there being some controversy regarding the look of the newer (supposedly Verhoeven "approved") releases. In looking at the screenshot comparisons of the newer version compared to the old MPEG-2 release, contrast looks really blown-out to me, and for some reason the film no longer looks like a product of its time. While I don't want to turn this thread into a "Total Recall" discussion, I must admit that I actually prefer the overall look of the old MPEG-2 Lionsgate release . Oddly, I've noticed that at local stores, none of them is even carrying the "Mind Bending" edition anymore (which was priced only a $1 or $2 more than the old release anyway), they're only carrying the old MPEG-2 disc...Seems strange to me...

While I will agree with you that "The Running Man" isn't perfect, I still really like the way the Lionsgate release both looks and sounds, and it's what I'll be sticking with. To be honest, going off of what I saw in those screenshots, I'd prefer they not remaster it along the lines of what "Total Recall" received, but that's just me...As for the Olive and Lionsgate Blu comparison caps I posted, one question I have though, which hopefully you can help shed some light on, is how come the new Olive release (which looks to be virtually identical to the Lionsgate release, except brighter) is exhibiting a lot of print damage that wasn't on the Lionsgate Blu? Detail looks to be pretty much the same, yet there's no damage on the LG version, and black levels seem better there also...Olive generally does a great job on their releases, so I was kind of stumped when I saw that...

Last edited by kdo; 04-24-2013 at 04:57 AM. Reason: spelling/grammar
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:13 AM.