Sequels that were GOOD! - Page 2 - Blu-ray Forum

joenostalgia23 · 11-26-2012, 01:02 AM

In response to the first post, wouldn't the James Bond films be excluded since they technically aren't sequels in the traditional sense?

There's too many good sequels to count. It'd be a lot easier to just name sequels that were actually better than the original film.

Hubunkey · 11-26-2012, 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joenostalgia23

In response to the first post, wouldn't the James Bond films be excluded since they technically aren't sequels in the traditional sense?

There's too many good sequels to count. It'd be a lot easier to just name sequels that were actually better than the original film.

Not really because it's still just 1 persons opinion. Some people are gonne like sequels better than an original and others won't

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-26-2012, 01:02 AM	#21
joenostalgia23 Blu-ray Guru Member since:Mar 2009 Blu-ray collection:1957 DVD collection:93 Trading Score:3	In response to the first post, wouldn't the James Bond films be excluded since they technically aren't sequels in the traditional sense? There's too many good sequels to count. It'd be a lot easier to just name sequels that were actually better than the original film.