| Site locale: United States |
|
||||
|
||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Deals |
Best Blu-ray Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
Price drops
|
![]() $9.99 | ![]() $38.99 | ![]() $8.99 | ![]() $18.84 | ![]() $17.28 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $17.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $27.99 | ![]() $19.99 | ![]() $41.99 | ![]() $7.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $12.99 | ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $17.99 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $69.99 |
|
|
#1 |
|
Active Member
|
I have a Blu Ray player connected via Digital Coax. I also have a DVD player that I want to hook up via Digital Coax (currently Analog). Is there any downside to hooking up the Blu Ray via Optical. I dont have that option with the DVD player, it's either Analog or Digital Coax and my receiver only has one Digital Coax input. My Blu Ray is my primary player and if Optical is a step down from Digital Coax, I'm not gonna mess with it. Thanx.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
i find that optical seems to have a better hmmmmm how do i say this..... not crackly when loud thang goin!!
PS3 40gb XBox 360
PSN ID: WTF22 XBL ID: SONY RULES ALL SONY 60" Grand WEGA A series SXRD 1080p SONY DAV-FC7 TiVo Series 3 PSP Slim & Fat both at 3.90 m33 custom firmware C'MON I ONLY BOUGHT GH3 FOR MY ROCK BAND !!WTF!! u talkin about no Mic plugged in!!! |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Active Member
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Special Member
|
There really isn't much difference between optical digital or coax digital. Some groups claim optical is better; other groups claim coax is a tad better. Either way; both have enough bandwidth to carry the dolby digital or dts signal.
Now, if you want to be able to carry the newer lossless or hd streams, it's a totally different story ofcourse. In that case neither one will be sufficient and will require HDMI instead. And oh, to answer the other question. I have my CD player hooked up via analog and optical, and I really can't tell a difference between the two. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Active Member
Nov 2007
|
If you use optical there is an extra layer of conversion when the electrical signal is converted to light and then back again at the other end. That said i have compared the 2 on my system and found the coax to be slightly better but the big advantage i find is in the connector, coax is much more solid and the cables are better built. The only time optical would be chosen over coax is in the case of RF interference, optical is more resistant than coax.
bill
Gear list:
Anthem Sim Audio Focal-JM Labs Cambridge Audio Sony Toshiba Kimber Straight Wire Ixos |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Blu-ray Baron
|
In the average home installation there should be no significant sound quality differences. But they do have their differences. Optical for one doesn't suffer from electrical interference issues like coax can. If cost is a consideration go with Digital Coax. Cheaper optical cords are made very poorly and can negatively impact the sound quality. At the higher end things like jitter come into play for each type of cable.
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Junior Member
Nov 2012
|
Quote:
I agree with that statement completely. The old fashioned looking connectors for the coax cables are much more solid. I have broken at least one Optical cord but never the coax or any older RCA wires. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
New Member
Nov 2012
|
At the higher end things like jitter come into play for each type of cable.
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
| Digital Coax VS. Optical VS. RCA??? | Audio Theory and Discussion | BrettLee3232 | 60 | 01-25-2013 01:28 PM |
| A question about Digital Coax... | Receivers | Captainhawk1 | 12 | 04-02-2009 04:43 AM |
| optical-coax converter help | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | stow123 | 3 | 03-22-2008 11:49 PM |
| Multi-Channel, Digital Coax, or Optical?!! | Audio Theory and Discussion | Col. Zombie | 7 | 03-15-2008 07:44 PM |
| rca = digital coax? | Receivers | The Big Blue | 5 | 01-09-2008 07:03 PM |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|