| Site locale: United States |
|
||||
|
||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Deals |
Best Blu-ray Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
Price drops
|
![]() $4.99 | ![]() $14.26 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $13.99 | ![]() $7.96 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $21.99 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $5.00 | ![]() $8.99 | ![]() $26.93 | ![]() $7.99 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $4.99 | ![]() $19.99 | ![]() $14.99 |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Jun 2011
|
i want your opinion on which has the best pq from the these in order, and explain why heres my choise nightmare on elm street 1984 alien 1979 halloween 1978 |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
|
Odd combo, but i'll throw in:
1) Alien Despite the new color timing, this is from 1979 and it looks like it was just shot yesterday. An insane level of detail, with extremely fine grain that doesn't obscure any detail. And the black levels are some of the inkiest i've seen on any blu-ray, ever. 2) Nightmare on Elm Street Still incredibly detailed, but at times has some slightly obscured detail due to the cheap film stock and heavy grain. The blacks aren't anywhere near as inky as Alien, but there's still very little crush going on. 3) Halloween Not a bad looking transfer at all, but its color timing is NOT approved by Dean Cundy or John Carpenter (i believe it's the transfer they used for the Divimax dvd release). Major fail on Anchor Bay's part releasing that version rather than a remaster of the Cundy approved one they used for the THX dvd release.
A/V Equipment:
Panasonic TC-P60ST50 Plasma Display Denon AVR-891 A/V Receiver Energy Take Classic Speakers Playstation 3 Slim Xbox 360 Nintendo Wii |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Banned
Jun 2011
|
Quote:
they was only some slight grain on the blu ray of nightmare on elm street, and that was only in a few dark scenes which still it looked great |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Special Member
Sep 2010
|
Alien looks the best. Best detail and clarity, best depth, best color rendition, and it's from a 4k scan and master. Halloween comes in at #2 despite the non-THX and non-original color timing, and ANOES comes in at a respectable 3 (and it the only 1.85:1 film among the three).
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Jun 2011
|
which blu ray has the most grain from the three
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Blu-ray Ninja
|
none of them have more grain than the other, but from what i remember NOES has the more instances of noticeable grain particuarly during darker scenes. nothing that isnt supposed to be there though.
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned
Jun 2011
|
its weird because users on this site have given nightmare on elm street higher rating for its pq than the other two, so why is that
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Blu-ray Ninja
|
because anyone can write a review, and not everyone is a professional reviewer that knows what makes good PQ that is an accurate representation of the source. the reviewers for this site game Alien 5/5 Halloween 4.5/5 and NOES 4/5.
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Banned
Jun 2011
|
do you think nightmare on elm street blu is the best it can ever look or is there any room for improvement? also i keep hearing the future is 4k and i was wondering if this movie would benefit from 4k
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Blu-ray Ninja
|
i think there is room for improvement, but it would be so minimal that it probably wouldnt make much of a difference. same goes for Halloween. Alien, however, is perfect. as far as 4k is concerned, any movie would benefit from it but i dont think most people would know the difference.
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Jan 2010
Upstate NY
|
Halloween
Nightmare On Elm Street Alien |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Blu-ray Ninja
Jul 2009
|
Toss up between Alien and Nightmare.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|