Hi all,
So the consensus is rather than encouraging 3D, the anaglyphic picture being transmitted would be of such poor quality it would produce the opposite affect instead?
Was not expecting it to rival HD quality, even though the transmission would be 1080i. Had hoped it would be on the line of "Journey To The Center of the Earth", "Polar Express" and two Three Stooges shorts I had on anaglyphic DVD. Though Journey had very bad cross talk, the overall impact of the 3D was impressive and those discs certainly got the bug started in me for wanting more.
Please know this was not to promote a return to anaglyphic on DVD. Anaglyphic was only meant to serve as the means for non-3D set owners to get a glimpse of what 3D would be like in the home. My hope was more might consider the 3D feature when next looking for a new set.
But if the picture would be that bad, then it wouldn't be good. But would it be bad more or less by our own standards - since we are all 3D aficionados to one degree or another - and not seen that way by the average consumer, especially if made aware of how improved the picture would be with a brand new home theater set-up? Don't forget, we would be looking at it through our eyes. This would only be an introduction for most others, something just to wet their whistles.
Just my way of trying to spread the word. Thanks for sharing your thoughts with me.
|