Rarely have I encountered a review as vague as the one whiteberry linked to! It not only seems like the reviewer hasn't watched the BD (review published 10 days before the street date), but also like he hasn't even watched the movie itself. The article is full of generic statements like "Its a light fluffy comedy but make no mistake the film has a sharp wit and a clearly polished screenplay" without any examples or deeper exploration. And the part that concerns the disc just cracked me up! "Colors are bright and not washed out... The sound is also great with a nice clean 2.0 mono track"!
