Quote:
Originally Posted by treyw00
that idiot wrote me back too. douche
"This was written for a technical audience and the premise was why the format was a failure on day one for the reasons I listed, HD-DVD could ramp to volume this year, Blu-Ray probably not until 2008/9 and by then it may be too late for the studios. The point was to avoid any future mistakes like this."
Rob Enderle
Principal Analyst
Enderle Group
|
respond to his statement and ask if HD DVD is such a Viable format AND Blu-Ray is not why is that the HD DVD format not being used for the following:
1)SOFTWARE...
2) video recordeing
both of which Blu-Ray is already being used for and in the case of recordeing has been used since 2003 in Asia and japan.
where is HD DVD's recorder's or SOFTWARE being put on as you would say makes HD DVD a viable format and not Blu-Ray.
here send him this:
The nine steering committee members backing the Blu-ray Disc are
Hitachi, LG Electronics, Matsushita Electric Industrial, Pioneer,
Royal Philips Electronics, Samsung Electronics, Sharp, Sony and
Thomson Multimedia. Aside from Warner Bros., the other committee
members are IBM, Intel, Taiwan's Industrial Technology Research
Institute (ITRI), JVC, Mitsubishi, NEC and
Toshiba.
http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/ne...ch/000063.html
tell him even in 2003 Toshiba backed blu-ray why the change..pure and simple IHD. that is the reason were in this mess...IHD and the BDA has already made the choice to use JAVA. but Microsoft would not have any of that.