View Single Post
Old 05-18-2022, 04:16 PM   #25692
EVOLVIST EVOLVIST is offline
Senior Member
 
EVOLVIST's Avatar
 
Jan 2011
141
22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aclea View Post
Yet a million miles away from the 'glamorous' male leading men you're complaining about. And Hollywood has always had them in every era. Even Robinson worked at the same studio as Errol Flynn, William Powell and Richard Barthelmess while in Walter Matthau's most successful years the box-office charts were topped by the likes of Paul Newman, Robert Redford, Ryan O'Neal, Warren Beatty and Burt Reynolds.

At least for me, I don't think the conversion is about handsome leading men, because yes, you're right, Hollywood has had that aesthetic from close to its inception. The beautiful leading man role really took off after WWI. Cinema needed more champions.

The "problem" today is a.) for some reason many, but not all, of the Hollywood Handsome actors can't act and b.) there are few roles for the average Joe who can act, and c.) everyone is beautiful in the ensemble cast, unless they pick one or two people for comedic relief.

The above mentioned High Society (1956) is a perfect example of an ensemble cast that wouldn't fly today. Everyone is in their 40s-50s, with Grace Kelly creeping up on 30.

Key Largo (1948) - Bogey was almost 50, Eddie was in his 50s, with Bacall being the infant at 24. At least it's not like Funny Face (1956) where the love interest between Astaire and Hepburn is almost creepy. Almost. I can't help but to laugh.

Who's going to pair young actresses with geezers today? I haven't seen one.

Last edited by EVOLVIST; 05-18-2022 at 05:24 PM. Reason: SP - twice!
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
moviflicilm (05-18-2022)