Quote:
Originally Posted by lukas741
You know as well as I do that there are 2 kinds of active glasses available for T.V., for ex: one that you can charge via a USB port and the other that requires a small battery, you can calculate the times of usage to charge either one, are they a bit more expensive, YES, do you need to be more cautious than the other passive-polarize cheap ones, YES, can you actually notice any other object in the view field flickering?...well I never had that issue. Proudness, happiness, satisfaction, luck...I just hope the T.V. last another 5 years.
|
But what i and you know isn't what most people know and that is the main reason why people passed on 3D. Tha hassle for them isn't a good thing to keep with 3D. So, for that, passive 3D is great, there are clip-on 3D glasses, reald 3D glasses, other brands 3D glasses that can isolate mor the light from the sides and allow more immersion and the costs for that are very very low. It would only take stores a little space for them to have these glasses exposed for clients to try them and would be a game changer to the format, unlike with active 3D glasses. People don't need to be educated about 3D, they need standardization on the tech.
My LG passive 3D tv is over 11 years and also works great