Quote:
Originally Posted by lukas741
I think you are off on why people passed on 3D...it was because of cheap passive 3D TV with bad resolution (720 P) and very low brightness levels along with those cheap flimsy polarized glasses...that is part of what really killed 3D... the truth is that active t.v. is more expensive along with glasses due to it being more superior and every way.
|
My 11 years TV says otherwise.
It's one of the first passive 3D TVs to be made from LG.
And it does show brightness enough that i have it just on 10% of power to watch any 3D movie i want to not have reflections on the glasses.
As i could watch on that video, Playstation 3D Display had also 720p on active 3D. Maybe that's why people stoped to like 3D. Playstation as a great brand selling bad 3D displays hurts whoever who bought it.
Of course there where also passive 3D TVs that were 720p(i don't know how that was possible) that when showing a 3D movie must have been with poor quality.
Still, comparing passive with active in an environment of family and guests, passive is much better not just because it is cheaper but because it has much less problems with lights and objects in field of vision because of the alternate shutters.
As Linus said... when 3D was in its last spasms LG brought to the market possibly the best line of 3D TVs to have ever existed and that could, if LG maintained annual releases of 4K 3D TVs, have kept or even improved 3D interresting up to these days.
When i go to watch a movie all i have to do is put my glasses... no need to sync or recharge.