Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan1973
So you are comparing the Marvel movies to the Fast & Furious movies? Last time I checked Marvel has a lot of different superhero characters to play around with compared to the Fast & Furious characters. Also the Nolan Batman movies were always going to be a trilogy. Way different than having a 10th and 11th Fast & Furious movie.
|
I'm not comparing anything, just following the same lead as the poster, about how silly it sounded. It's only different if you choose to see it that way, but really, it's not.
But, I mean, why not? If his reasoning is that it was the "best ending" or the best time to end the series, then sure. Marvel movies are hardly good, but they've really been turkeys since Endgame "finished" that whole storyline and killed off the two biggest characters. Last time I checked F&F has a lot of different characters to play around with, and they've done so, and brought in new ones. See how that works the same way?
And if it was the "best sendoff" for Paul, who dies, then my comment about Ledger stands as well. Pretending like F&F couldn't go on after him is no different than saying Batman couldn't go on after Heath.
Hollywood was (and is) a business. So if franchises continue to make money, they will continue making movies.