Quote:
Originally Posted by James Luckard
My point was just that they're identical on an actual 35mm release print, and the difference is so minute there's no difference in how a director would have framed for any of the three in the film era.
|
Blakninja claimed Titanic was intended to be 2.39:1, not 2.35:1. I just provided proof from Cameron himself to refute that claim.
If 2.35:1 and 2.39:1 are virtually the same, then there was no need for blakninja to claim that Titanic's intended aspect ratio was 2.39:1 and not 2.35:1. So, what's the harm if someone said it's 2.35:1?