Quote:
Originally Posted by ed4246
Didn't you just post a post on hating and posting?
|
Yeah, I did.
But there's a difference, do you see it?
If not, allow me to explain.
No, it's too long, allow me to sum up.
Comparing someone who can't act to Tom Cruise, especially when said someone is only 'funny' to people who have way too much Mountain Dew, Doritos, and Pot in their system is just asinine.
As I have mentioned, and Greenscar agreed with, he's a one trick pony, he doesn't have funny jokes, he just says stuff louder and expects a laugh. There's not really any situations that he's been in that has required too much physical comedy, he hasn't been in any dramas to speak of, {unless you count Knocked Up, which people should have been crying at how bad it was} he's just got himself surgically attached to Seth Rogen and that's the only reason why he's still working.
Much like William Hung, he should just go away and spare the rest of us one more louder-than-it-should-be joke.
It would be entirely different if he wrote, directed, produced, did something other than parrot a joke written by someone else that he makes not funny by saying it louder than you really should be. That's not acting, that's annoyance.
As for my other post {the one about George A. Romero making zombie flicks} Of COURSE George A. Romero makes zombie flicks, people seem to get on his back about that, it's like getting on Lucas for making Star Wars stuff, that's what he does, and arguably he does it well. Now getting on Romero for making zombie movies {because he has talent in directing, writing and producing} is different than getting on Jonah Hill for being not funny but pretending to be.
Logan