Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu2U
I am absolutely floored. A movie that was made in 1968 and was ground breaking in film technology and technique. This was done with almost no blue screening. And almost all in camera effects. An absolute great film achievement in directing. Seriously look at it. Does that look 1968 to you? There is crap put out 40 years later FORTY, that is not as clean as looking as 2001. I can certainly accept that it is not "your cup of tea" that's fine I respect people that do not lkie it. But that movie is more of a piece of art and less of a movie and maybe that is your point.
In 1991, it was deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" by the United States Library of Congress. 
I think age might have something to do sometimes with not liking this movie. I think the younger generation need things fast paced. I'm 44. I'm in no hurry. |
Your theory is wrong, I am 41, love the book but find the movie a total waste of time, like the poster said before, if you want to actualy know what is going on, read the book cause Kubrick sure won't be telling you.