Blu-ray Forum - View Single Post - What would you do first? Sub or reciever?

Dieselboy · 09-08-2009, 07:07 PM

I currently have an older (around 8 years) Kenwood reciever that is obviously pre-lossless sound and is 5.1 with 100 watts/channel. It sounds pretty good to me (especially if the tracks are in DTS), though I'm used to it too. I also currently have a POLK PSW10 subwoofer that basically sucks ass imho... now with that said if you were me, where would you spend your first $400-$600 or so? On a new reciever that will decode lossess sound and do 7.1? Or on a new sub something like an ed a2 300 or the svs/hsu equivalant? Feel free to chime in with specific recommendations for either choice please.

09-08-2009, 07:07 PM	#1
Dieselboy Active Member Top ranked HT gallery Member since:Jul 2009 Home Theater Gallery:16	What would you do first? Sub or reciever? I currently have an older (around 8 years) Kenwood reciever that is obviously pre-lossless sound and is 5.1 with 100 watts/channel. It sounds pretty good to me (especially if the tracks are in DTS), though I'm used to it too. I also currently have a POLK PSW10 subwoofer that basically sucks ass imho... now with that said if you were me, where would you spend your first $400-$600 or so? On a new reciever that will decode lossess sound and do 7.1? Or on a new sub something like an ed a2 300 or the svs/hsu equivalant? Feel free to chime in with specific recommendations for either choice please. Last edited by Dieselboy; 09-08-2009 at 07:34 PM.