View Single Post
Old 09-11-2009, 03:19 AM   #11
mj79 mj79 is offline
Banned
 
mj79's Avatar
 
Jun 2009
San Antonio/ Duluth Mn
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by benricci View Post
It's actually the most inaccurate way to judge picture quality since the image is not in motion as intended. Picture quality is not meant to be critiqued based upon still images, since the grain pattern and image structure changes from frame to frame.
so in sense, how come if i pause ironman, darknight, wall-e etc.. it looks like a 10 megapixel still, camera shot and crystal clear.. Not only that but the pq while actually playing is much sharper/crisper, etc.. like a blu ray should be..

I think people are judging the PQ of this movie based alone on what it is... A semi low budget horror flick from 10 years ago... Not what a true BR should look like for todays standards..

Not saying it isn't a good pq, but just not to todays standards i guess.. this makes alot more sense in my head before it gets typed out
  Reply With Quote