Quote:
Originally Posted by sbjork
And... He says "The daytime scenes at the Galapagos could pass for a film shot today, with the amount of resolvable detail on display," all while showing one of the matte shots. 2K matte painting, 2K composite, scanned back out to film, then rescanned at 4K, looking like it was shot today. He also describes what he calls a "handful" of effects shots that don't look quite so good, then describes a series of scenes that he says aren't effects shots that also don't look good, some of which are indeed effects shots. Color me not impressed by him.
It's like anybody who says anything negative is automatically granted credibility, while anybody who says anything positive is treated skeptically.
|
I think it is like him saying it ranged from DVD to very good 4K and rated it a 7.9 overall for video and an 8.2 for audio. I thought most of the people commenting on the video were more critical than Shane was.