Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexKx
Now I swear. Proof that I wasn't freakin' nuts after all. You folks totally SLAMMED me for being off my rocker and flat on the floor when I found out over the last couple of months that Blu-Ray discs were being used for a TOTALLY different reason than what I understood that they were going to be used for after YEARS of waiting for it to be released since the year 2001 or so.
http://www.howstuffworks.com/framed....gy/3696306.stm
Now again. I TOTALLY think Blu-Ray's capacity should be used for High Definition before getting more hours onto one layer of a disc but it certainly IS different from what I understood it was going to be used for for a LONG time until the last couple of months according to this article if I am understanding it right. Am I not? I just didn't understand the facts of High Definition and that a clear cut one way decision was made for the entire industry. Again it is the right one but am I still to understand that the storage space should be able to be increased more and more to hold more hours on one layer like it was originally thought it would? |
you got that from my post on that other guys thread didnt you lol
glad it helped someone (unless you didnt get it there cuz then im owned)
wow that was your thread