View Single Post
Old 04-16-2010, 10:51 PM   #91
Twisted Twisted is offline
New Member
 
Apr 2010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by csdot View Post
i own blade runner. ive seen blade runner dozens of times in my life. if predator had been filmed with the same equipment/film and by the same crew as blade runner it would look just like blade runner but it wasnt. what about this do you not understand? blade runner and predator are both blu-rays that display the movies as they are.
You're wrong, EVERYTHING can look better when you edit a 35mm movie, espacelly a cheap release like Predator. The movie can absolutly look better than this. It's always a question of money: if the studio want to pay for the remasterisation of the sound and the picture. The original film negative format is largely better than what they extract for making this 25gb single layer blu-ray edition. It's exactly the same thing for the first DVD edition of the movie (who looks like a VHS) and later they use all the potentiel of the media with another release. In this case, they don't use the potentiel of the blu-ray, maybe for the sound, but not for the picture.
  Reply With Quote