Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleDark
I have, and I've seen the original, and to me its a wash. One is more filmic, but suffers from compression artifacts, while the other has heavy ammounts of DNR, but is more vivid, has better contrast. Either version you champion has faults and liking one over the other doesn't make yours or my s#$t stink any less.
And I'm not saying that a lack of grumbling from the filmmakers justifies my liking the new BD more than the original, but to point out to people on this board who are getting upset about this BD that if this transfer is such an affront to the way it was meant to be seen, where are their voices in all this? Could it be that they just don't care?
|
Well since you have seen this new release I would assume that you do want movies to look like high def sports and day time soaps. The artificial motion enhancement didn't bother you at all? I am not talking about still frame shots here I am talking about the whole flow of the movie.
I think when most say "meant to be seen" they are implying theatrical release. Day one at the theater.