Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinemach
Yeah the more I hear about this film the less I'm really getting into seeing it--honestly I knew the sequel wasn't going to be as good esp since it wasn't (and couldn't be) in Vegas, which was a real huge part of the appeal for me about Hangover in the first place. The trailers basically confirmed the carbon-copy of the original nature, but that wouldn't have killed it for me as long as it still had a vestige of funny.
Then I hear Ken Jeong and Zach Galifanakis have upped screen time, and those two definitely work in smaller doses for me--MUCH smaller doses--esp Jeong, I thought his schtick went too long and got very annoying in the first and he was only in three scenes. So I know this movie won't be as funny for me now. And now I read about the gratuitous shock thrown in [Show spoiler]particularly the shemale/penis stuff , and well...my expectations for this are even drastically lower than when it started out. |
You've been given false information. Jeong is in more than the first (but only maybe 15 min total) and Zach is just as involved as he was in the first.
Its not as funny as the first, but its still going to be easily the funniest movie until 30 minutes or less.
Hangover Part I : 8/10
Hangover Part II : 7.5/10