That review is totally biased and ridiculous. I get tired of it when people talk about the 360 having hundreds of games and the PS3 only having a couple dozen. I mean, the PS3 has only been out a few months and the 360's been out, what, almost a year and a half? And then he says he likes the controller but it's not as good as the Wii's. Okay...? The Wii, if you can't tell, is basically a revamped GameCube. Graphics are basically the same. Still doesn't play DVD's. What people are buying in that system is the remote; that's basically what it comes down to, and that's not a bad thing - just a different preference. The PS3 is much different than that. I think it's funny that he says that the PSNetwork is not as good as XBox Live; okay, well I guess I'd rather have to pay to utilize all the features on my system. Seriously, it's free, so I'm okay with its "shortcomings." One last thing: he is using a 30" CRT HDTV...bad choice. Not to bash those TV's (they still look good) but they usually don't have quite the same resolution as an LCD of the same size would. Fanboys always find something to bash so that they can justify why their system is superior. Personally, I researched both the 360 and the PS3 and to me, the hands-down better choice, the unbiased choice was the PS3.
|