View Single Post
Old 01-30-2014, 03:26 PM   #3
Roy Batty Roy Batty is offline
Special Member
 
Roy Batty's Avatar
 
Oct 2009
New York City
202
2674
3
15
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbadwoppet View Post
The Paramount DOES have DNR, no bones about it but it DOES have grain as well.
No, there's not a single instance of grain there. There's only some electronic noise due to the DNR+sharpening, which is completely different.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbadwoppet View Post
What is completely laughable is the colour issue. Those who find the Paramount boosted, they do so in comparison to the MGM DVD/TT BD, not on knowledge of the theatrical exhibition. Real Technicolor was indeed THAT saturated.
That may well be, but certainly not that contrast-boosted.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HD Goofnut View Post
The TT disc is just too dark. As I said before this is broad daylight in the middle of South Africa, but it does not appear that way. Also, the print damage appears to be at least moderate. Then the colors are just wrong, which is probably due to the transfer being entirely too dark. Then you've got almost no extras and heavy EE on top of the aforementioned problems. The U.K. disc wins hands down. It would be dead even IMHO if the TT disc had more extras and was $10-15.
Sure, I was referring to the transfer only.

To me, at the end of the day, one looks like film, the other does not. That's paramount in my book.

As you put it, I guess we will have to agree to disagree.


Last edited by Roy Batty; 01-30-2014 at 03:32 PM.
  Reply With Quote