Quote:
Originally Posted by mjbethancourt
I'm sorry, what was that? I couldn't hear you, on account of I'm still laughing out loud at the assertions that there is no benefit from going larger than 27" at 3', and that feature films were meant to be seen as a little window on a box instead of as an eye-engaging panorama.
I didn't assert a benefit or negative beyond when you go to to ludicrous levels (eg: 2 foot from a 55"), I stated the recommended viewing distance based on thx and smpte standards and then stated the benefits or lack there off of going beyond uhd resolutions at such a relative screen size.
Extrapolated to larger dimensions, 27" at 3' would be the same as sitting 80 feet away from a 60 foot cinema screen; that's probably going to be the back row, if the auditorium is even that large.
Depends on the cinema. Three screen heights for 2.39:1 content is smpte standard though. Funny how you don't bother addressing any of my points but make up your own versions of what I said and then respond with an equally odd response. Instead of extrapolating, you could take the one minute it would take to find the viewing distance standard as per thx and smpte.
... pfft,  "misinformation and obviously trolling"... your sense of humor needs work.
I wasn't being funny nor was I trying to be. You logic needs work though. |
I'm done with you regarding this topic. You haven't given a real response thus far and just spewed nonsense Mr "I sit two foot away from a 40" screen but 55" is what I want at that distance". Which yes if that's how you view content going beyond uhd will be of benefit, but I never said otherwise.