Can someone please explain to me how James Cameron was supposed to answer the question of what he thought about virtual reality? As far as I'm concerned, his answer was spot on. I find it refreshing to hear someone answer questions honestly, and not with a PC filter in mind.
We all know that James Cameron did not invent 3D technology. However, and please correct me if I'm wrong as I never saw Avatar in 3D, he did reintroduce 3D from a different perspective. 3D used to rely on images jumping off the screen. Avatar, on the other hand, created depth within the screen. To me, the 3D that jumps off the screen is more gimmicky, where as the 3D that adds depth can create an immersive experience.
When I read the article and realized that Oculus Rift was a virtual reality technology, I immediately thought of the "Choose Your Own Adventure" books that came out in the 80's. Other than dictating the storyline, what is the point? The technology would work for games, but not movies.
|