Who LOVES Spiderman 3?

[Lacit170]

Who loves Spiderman 3 and why? Have not seen this one yet....

[Batman1980]

LOL you just opened a can of worms. While this one was my favourite one of the trilogy because of all the things Spidey and Pete and Harry went through, most people who saw it thought it was horrible. Excellent CGI, good laughs and a lot of twists made up for bad acting and some parts that drag a bit.

[Another_Dude]

Did we need Emo Spidy?

Nope, we sure didn't.

[Blu-Benny]

liked it but didn't love it.

[TTC1984]

I also fall under the "liked, didnt love" category. It had its moments but was inferior and overlong compared to its predecessors.

[Lacit170]

Originally Posted by TTC1984

I also fall under the "liked, didnt love" category. It had its moments but was inferior and overlong compared to its predecessors.

Do you own it though?

[Mike53421]

It is underrated. Search for old posts of me *****ing about it, but I do have to give it that, it's underrated. With a couple minor changes this movie could have been ALOT better.

[Lacit170]

Originally Posted by Mike53421

It is underrated. Search for old posts of me *****ing about it, but I do have to give it that, it's underrated. With a couple minor changes this movie could have been ALOT better.

so then its worth watching in your opinion.... do you own it>?

[jadedeath]

Originally Posted by Mike53421

It is underrated. Search for old posts of me *****ing about it, but I do have to give it that, it's underrated. With a couple minor changes this movie could have been ALOT better.

Minor changes that would have resulted in an entirely different movie.

Logan

[fatediesel]

Didn't hate it, but nowhere near the level of the first 2. Too many villains, the dancing scene, Kirsten Dunst is just annoying in it.

[Batman1980]

Originally Posted by fatediesel

Kirsten Dunst is just annoying period.

Fixed. On a related note, that horrible singing she did in the movie was not faked, she really can't sing.

[Rblu-Dblu]

<<<<<Thinks Isla Fisher would've made a much better Mary Jane than that snaggletooth Kirsten Dunst.

[jphantom]

Originally Posted by fatediesel

Didn't hate it, but nowhere near the level of the first 2. Too many villains, the dancing scene, Kirsten Dunst is just annoying in it.

+1

[Sylin]

If you want honesty, I would rather...

...be strapped to a chair naked and endure the same torture that James Bond did in Casino Royale, whilst having 1000 angry mosquitoes sting my softest parts, have my eyeballs propped open by a spiky Jigsaw contraption, and be French-kissed by Bea Arthur...

...rather than watch Spider-Man 3 ever again.

It's THAT bad (IMHO).

Kirstin Dunst phoned in her performance. It's terrible. I lost all respect for her... twice.

Tobey Maguire should have walked out of the room when they rehearsed the Emo dancing scene, knowing how ridiculous it would be. Stupid, stupid, stupid. Did not fit the character or the film in the least.

Don't get me started on the reporter scenes during the 3rd Act. OMG. Worst acting is rarely seen in big budget movies, and I've seen Battlefield Earth!

Venom was laughable. He's supposed to be a badass, but he comes off as a whiny little brat. There's absolutely nothing menacing about him. Huge disappointment.

The redeeming points were Bryce Dallas Howard as Gwen and Thomas Hayden Church as Sandman. Their performances were A+ and their characters should have been given TONS more development and screen time.

It's time for a series re-boot.

[Navster]

wow thats a little harsh... great movie... better than part 2 for sure!... I would reccomend watching!

[Dubstar]

it was okay, but generally it was a clusterf*** of a movie.

[Darkdruid81]

Originally Posted by Sylin

If you want honesty, I would rather...

...be strapped to a chair naked and endure the same torture that James Bond did in Casino Royale, whilst having 1000 angry mosquitoes sting my softest parts, have my eyeballs propped open by a spiky Jigsaw contraption, and be French-kissed by Bea Arthur...

...rather than watch Spider-Man 3 ever again.

It's THAT bad (IMHO).

Kirstin Dunst phoned in her performance. It's terrible. I lost all respect for her... twice.

Tobey Maguire should have walked out of the room when they rehearsed the Emo dancing scene, knowing how ridiculous it would be. Stupid, stupid, stupid. Did not fit the character or the film in the least.

Don't get me started on the reporter scenes during the 3rd Act. OMG. Worst acting is rarely seen in big budget movies, and I've seen Battlefield Earth!

Venom was laughable. He's supposed to be a badass, but he comes off as a whiny little brat. There's absolutely nothing menacing about him. Huge disappointment.

The redeeming points were Bryce Dallas Howard as Gwen and Thomas Hayden Church as Sandman. Their performances were A+ and their characters should have been given TONS more development and screen time.

It's time for a series re-boot.

Well said +1

[fiveseven4combat]

Originally Posted by fatediesel

Didn't hate it, but nowhere near the level of the first 2. Too many villains, the dancing scene, Kirsten Dunst is just annoying in it.

The prolonged not needed dance scene actually was my favorite part.

Overall Spiderman 3 ruined the trilogy. I still watch it every now and then trying to find it's good parts.

[KingBing]

I enjoyed it, not the best out of the trilogy but not a bad movie IMO

[Blu-Ron]

Originally Posted by Lacit170

Who loves Spiderman 3 and why? Have not seen this one yet....

If you are a diehard Spidey fan (comicbooks) be prepared for a letdown. They changed the chronology around to the point where it doesn't even make sense anymore. If ya don't care for that stuff...you might enjoy it.