Worst transfers since 2010

[Blu-21]

Most films shot in the digital modern era we live in today look strong when they are transferred to BD, but can everyone think of films made from lets say 2010 onwards, that for whatever reason, don't look so good?

[Suntory_Times]

Originally Posted by Blu-21

Most films shot in the digital modern era we live in today look strong when they are transferred to BD, but can everyone think of films made from lets say 2010 onwards, that for whatever reason, don't look so good?

Transcendence (look great in cinemas, ee and dnr ruin the blu-ray) and Pacific Rim in 3d has a vertical disparity on blu-ray that makes it unwatchable for myself.

[generalZee]

Can't say that I know of any, when I see a film in the cinemas, I can say with 99% certainty that it's going just as good on Blu-Ray. It can also depend on ones equipment as well, how well calibrated it is and such, on how a new transfer looks. There is also another factor to consider as well, whether the movie is shot on digital or 35mm, and I know that some people go nuts when they see film grain on their monitors at home. While they don't show film prints at majority of the theaters these days, some directors still choose to shoot their films on 35mm.

[Bumblefeet]

Basically anything color graded with that annoying teal and orange filter?

[Suntory_Times]

Originally Posted by Bumblefeet

Basically anything color graded with that annoying teal and orange filter?

That isn't really an issue with the transfer though is it.

Also if we are talking audio and not just video we can immediately include every blu-ray that for some silly reason clips the bass (Tron Legacy comes straight to mind).

[Visionist]

Dredd 3D's combined 2D/3D disc doesn't come off lightly.

Get the French release for seperate discs and better quality.