No Strings Attached vs Friends with Benefits

[eiknarf]

I didn't see a poll for this. I searched back to 2010. If there's one, I apologize.

[AaronJ]

I hate to vote against, but No Strings Attached is the better film.

[eiknarf]

Originally Posted by AaronJ

I hate to vote against, but No Strings Attached is the better film.

I feel like it's almost Natalie Portman vs Mila Kunis! Which is ironic since they were both hooking up in Black Swan

[JeffTheMovieGuy]

Friends with Benefits

It's got the better background characters Emma Stone, Andy Samberg, Patricia Clarkson, Woody Harrelson, Richard Jenkins.

[eiknarf]

Whoa.
Both pro critics and audiences say Friends with Benefits is the better movie (when comparing at Metacritic)

[esteban²]

Both are mediocre at best, but out of these two I'll go for Portman & Kutcher.

[Batman1980]

Friends with Benefits was/is far better.

[Monterey Jack]

Both needed female nudity.

[BluRayTim]

Originally Posted by Batman1980

Friends with Benefits was/is far better.

I completely agree.

I have to admit, it's a real tough call as to who's better between the leading woman in each movie (outside of looks that is, where Mila has the clear advantage, though Natalie is far from a slouch ). However, I much prefer Justin Timberlake to Ashton Kutcher (though I don't particularly care for either one ).

[Hucksta G]

Friends with Benefits (7/10)
No Strings Attached (6/10)

[StevenV]

C) Black Swan...