|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $37.99 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.99 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 | ![]() $28.99 | ![]() $45.00 | ![]() $23.89 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $19.99 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Special Member
|
![]()
I have noticed that the reviews of new disks do not seem to take into account the video/audio quality in making the overall score. Attached are three examples where the video/audio/extra features do not seem to affect the final score.
I generally do not care about this sites movie content reviews; I only care about the quality of the encodes. On a site dedicated to physical media, it seems odd that a movie reviewed at 5.0/5.0/4.5 stars for encode and extras would get an overall review of 3.5, the same as the content review. Do these things matter at all to the overall score? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|