|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $35.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $33.49 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $35.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $27.00 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.48 | ![]() $42.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $9.99 14 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
|
![]()
or rather, is current HD resolution the end all be all?
I'm well aware that the way the picture is displayed will change in the coming years with 3D, etc., but do you think we'll ever really see a home theater media delivering more than 1080p resolution go mainstream? I'm aware that things like Quad-HD and Super-HD are in the works, but with TV sizes in homes averaging between 42" and 65" would a higher resolution make enough of a difference to become mainstream? I'm thinking not. |
![]() |
#2 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
#9 | |
Blu-ray Count
Jul 2007
Montreal, Canada
|
![]() Quote:
2) who cares about the average, it is what each one has, my screen is 10' wide 3) the issue with averages that they are constantly growing, and lately have been growing fast, who's to say what the average TV size will be in 10 years or 20 or 30? if in the 30's people said the average TV size is 10"-15" would it be relevant today? Obviously a TV can't grow to bigger then the room so there is a max in that, but 42" or even 65" still leaves a lot of place for growth. In the old days it was a lot more limited with depth (CRT tube or RPTV) and weight but with flat panels the growth has been easier. |
|
![]() |
#10 |
Blu-ray Count
Jul 2007
Montreal, Canada
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
TV screen sizes would pretty much need to triple in order to get any advantage from a higher resolution than Blu-ray provides.
I mean, it will happen eventually, but I don't think it'd catch on with anyone but the videophiles with 100+ inch screens. Us people down on earth with 30 inches, 40 inches, even 60 inches... we stand to gain nothing by upgrading to a higher resolution. Most people don't even take full advantage of their 1080p. A lot of people with 1080p sets sit so far back that a 720p set would look the same. That said, I look forward to the day still. Sadly though, films made between the late nineties and about now are locked in to 2K resolution permanently due to being mastered as digital intermediates. So you're never going to be able to enjoy greats like Star Wars Episode II or Batman & Robin in anything higher than 2K, even if new screens come out, even if new software standards come out. Not to mention films shot digitally too. |
![]() |
#12 | |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() Quote:
Batman and Robin was not edited with a DI and Star Wars 2 and 3 where shot at the same resolution as blu ray. Imho, there really nothing to gain above uncompressed 2K for normal home or cinema use (imax is a different story), assuming you roughly follow thx viewing distance to screen size rules/reccomendations. Also I believe the first film to use a DI was Amelie in 2001. That bieng said in terms of a mass adopted product blu ray is already overkill for most consumers. Last edited by Suntory_Times; 02-22-2010 at 11:06 AM. |
|
![]() |
#13 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
I think any resolution over 1080P such as 4K and above will need a 20 foot screen to make use of that kind of resolution.
Personally for me I am just waiting for some kind of holodeck to replace television in this century. ![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Yep, I'm in that boat. I bought a 32" 1080P TV before I got my blu-ray player & HT system. I have to sit no more than 8 feet away to really see the difference from 720P.
|
![]() |
#16 |
Banned
|
![]()
I think 1080p is at the edges of diminishing returns. Considering that even some 1080p reproductions are woefully absent of increased resolution over the 480i versions, I don't think going to a higher resolution standard will do much good.
|
![]() |
#17 |
Blu-ray Samurai
May 2007
Indianapolis
|
![]()
For many years CRT TVs went through changes that improved PQ. I think we will see better and better 1080p TVs as improvements come to these newer and less mature technologies.
|
![]() |
#18 |
Power Member
|
![]()
I suspect home video will remain at 1080p for a very long time.
1140p and eventually 2160p displays may become available to high-end users, but they will primarily be used to view upconverted 1080p video. 1080p is good enough for 99% of the population - of course, the other 1% consists of primarily blu-ray.com posters. ![]() Some things are slow to change, HDTV planning started in the 1980's and has only recently become dominant. DVD-A and SACD never became mainstream because most consumers were happy with CD quality. In fact, music distribution is moving from uncompressed (CD) to lossy-compressed audio (mp3 and mp4(aac)). |
![]() |
#20 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
The End Is Near ((coming To Blu-ray)) | Blu-ray Movies - North America | ouiwey | 0 | 09-21-2009 03:00 AM |
The end of Blu-ray is here! ;) | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | ReduxInflux | 45 | 08-16-2007 04:13 PM |
High End Blu Ray | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | THE STUD | 0 | 04-17-2007 06:37 PM |
The BLU-RAY MOVIES that would end the HD War are... | Blu-ray Movies - North America | octogon | 21 | 01-13-2007 03:02 AM |
|
|