|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $45.00 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $82.99 | ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $27.95 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.95 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.49 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $18.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $23.60 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Hi everyone.
![]() We all collect blu rays to a certain extent because we collect them (we want to have them permanently in our collection). After buying all the new releases, I understood that I need to go a little on the classic side of titles as well, and understood that there are more older movies worth owning permanently in my collection as compared to newer one. Which camp are you guys in. Do you think older titles are the ones really worth owning permanently or the newer titles which benefit just marginally more from new film stock? Do ownership of older titles or newer titles give you more satisfaction? Is blu ray a mircale for older titles as much as for newer titles? Thanks. ![]() Last edited by Marcus Wright; 10-25-2010 at 09:53 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|