|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.97 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.99 27 min ago
| ![]() $24.99 | ![]() $39.95 27 min ago
| ![]() $22.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $44.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
|
![]()
I tried to get answers in the Display Theory board and nothing against the users that replied in that thread, but I didn't really get the answers I wanted.
I know that films are shot at 24fps... but I want to know is, how do these films look when displayed at 96hz compared to something on an LCD or LED that uses motion-flow or true-motion? Does the 96hz allow for more fluid and clearer motion when it comes to camera movements? Fast paced action? Quick body movements?, etc, etc. I'm going to be getting a new TV pretty soon, really want to get this right and not have any regrets. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|