|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.10 1 hr ago
| ![]() $48.44 58 min ago
| ![]() $33.54 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $39.02 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 |
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
|
![]()
I've heard the original film stock/elements of a movie - given good and "proper" condition of preservation - can last 50 years, then severe signs of decay will show up.
So basically, all the seventies, eighties and nineties movies have many decades or years ahead of them before their picture quality would further degrade. Is it true? I'm just worried for the fifties/sixties movies which didn't get a BD treatment yet. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|