|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $29.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 45 min ago
| ![]() $45.00 1 day ago
| ![]() $84.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $82.99 | ![]() $14.97 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 1 day ago
| ![]() $17.49 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.95 1 day ago
| ![]() $26.59 1 day ago
| ![]() $33.99 2 hrs ago
|
|
View Poll Results: Which HD codec do you prefer (or is best)? | |||
MPEG-4/AVC |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
130 | 86.67% |
VC-1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
20 | 13.33% |
Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Special Member
|
![]()
When I first got into BD in the Fall of '09, and eventually learned of the 3 video codecs used for BD transfers (MPEG-2, MPEG-4/AVC, and VC-1) I thought VC-1 was the better of the 2 true HD codecs. I thought their transfers were smoother looking (little or no grain), and presented what I thought a good HD transfer was supposed to look like. But then when I started seeing more AVC transfers, I notice the grain structures actually increased detail.
If I'm not mistaken, the VC-1 codec was originally licensed or produced or something like that by Microsoft, while the MPEG variants were Apple properties. I may be wrong on that, but I'm just going on memory from what I read on Wikipedia. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
The Descent MPEG vs AVC (need help from AVC owners) | Blu-ray Movies - North America | Eagle_23 | 105 | 04-06-2021 03:29 AM |
ZODIAC BD AVC VS VC-1,AVC is the winner | Blu-ray Movies - North America | Scorxpion | 28 | 12-27-2013 01:49 AM |
Alright, need speaker help | Speakers | skatalite | 6 | 09-03-2009 05:05 AM |
The Kids Are Alright | Wish Lists | BIGLAD | 1 | 09-09-2008 05:00 PM |
T3- Was alright with me | Blu-ray Movies - North America | photorebel | 13 | 01-02-2008 02:16 PM |
|
|