|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.79 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $33.49 |
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
Sep 2011
Ny
|
![]()
Has anyone seen Dabangg 2? im hearing lots of good things about it.. as a die heart salman khan fan i really wish EROS releases the Bluray of this movie...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Active Member
|
![]()
saw the movie on the first day - Entertainment was limited to a cpl scenes only but overall disappointing in the rest. Sad that Arbaaz khan and Salman Khan played it very safely (similar to Don 2).
The movie was basically a made using a template of the first one (placement of songs, fights and emotional scenes) Prakash Raj was weak as a villan no patch on Sonu Sood Deepak Dobriyal had the best lines in the movie. All songs were weak bar Dagabaaz Re. Fevicol made no sense in the scheme of the story. There blatant product placement was annoying. Also, the titles were a nice rip of Sherlock Holmes. Watching Dabang 2, i appreciated the first one a lot more now than when it first released. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() But yeah a very weak film only saved by a full in form Salman Khan who doesn't give you a dull moment whenever he is on screen in the film...wish he worked on better scripted films |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
|
![]() Quote:
I'm surprised that, as a die hard SK fan, you haven't seen it yet. Or have you? Personally I found it to be a bigger and better sequel to Dabangg. Highly recommended for a great couple of hours of entertainment ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Active Member
Sep 2011
Ny
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
@WantedTM: I wonder if you'd find these movies interesting
1900 5hr 17min Die Nibelungen 4hr 42min (2 movies with continuous story) Seven Samurai 3hr 27min |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Dragun; 12-23-2012 at 05:42 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Active Member
Sep 2011
Ny
|
![]()
@ravenus i hardly see any hollywood movies but the bollywood long 3 4 hour films i love like lagaan,lajja,mohabbatein etc...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
None of the movies I mentioned are Hollywood movies. In fact they have the sort of storylines that might well have been attempted in Bollywood (Seven Samurai was ripped off in an indirect way as Khotey Sikkey and later as China Gate).
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Active Member
Sep 2011
Ny
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Junior Member
Dec 2012
|
![]()
Loved the movie but its typical Indian Salman Khan type of movies if you hate him you're hate the movie if you love him you'll love the movie
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Active Member
Sep 2011
Ny
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Active Member
Sep 2011
Ny
|
![]()
i had this argument with couple of other people on here earlier to so today im gona comment on this LAST TIME ... i prefer a movie should be atleast 2 hour 15 minutes or more the longer the better as longest the movie is good !! cuz heres the thing you spend like 20 dollars on gas (depending on how far the theater is) a ticket is around 10 to 12 dollars at the theater i go to in nj plus if the movie is in 3d like don and ra.one were than the tickets are like 15 16 dollars, if you go out with family so thats like 70 80 dollars on tickets plus junk food and if you have dinner aswell than usually for me and my family it costs more than 100 dollars watching a movie... so my point is if you are going to spend more than 100 dollars just cuz your going to the movies than you just dont want the movie to end in like 2 hours!!! and intermission happens in what like 45 50 minutes like kites did!!!i respect and understand all of your opnions but try understanding what im trying to say ,yes 2 hour movies arent bad but they should have a decent running time cuz you dont wanna go sit in the auditorium and b4 you know it in 2 hours your outa there!plus i usually go with my parents and family they all think the same way as i do i hope you guys understand my point thats all.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
Tip: save a link of this thread on your desktop and paste the link in reply whenever next time anyone asks u the same. Coming to the subject matter, the only differnce between you and other people and perhaps why people repeat this question to you time and again is because I guess most of them including me do not think of the overall experience of movie watching the way you do. You have connected almost all possible external aspects with the film like the price we spend, the people we go with, what we eat and do during interval and after film. That whole experience makes it big for you and thats why u feel the longer the duration, the more u feel the day spent was worth it. We all understand that. However we, at least I on the other hand stick to only and only the film and how its merits are vis-a-vis other films. No matter what duration, if a film holds, it holds...as simple as that. I never even dream about connecting it monetarily or any other way whatsoever to determine if it is worth it. Movie watching - a noteworthy event for you is just an internalisation process for many others. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Active Member
Sep 2011
Ny
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Active Member
Sep 2011
Ny
|
![]()
Another thing is if we even look at the bollywood 100 cr club the big hits excluding salman movies .. are movies with good running times like agneepath,housefull 2,3 idiots,jab tak hai jaan etc these are just to name a few.. and the movies which come out on diwali in my opnion are the biggest films of the year they all are good lengthy films even in 2012 this year jab tak hai jaan came out which was almost 3 hours now if it was only 2 hours i guarantee a lot of people wouldive felt disapointed cuz 1 more thing is short movies sometimes feel empty you know what i mean? i heard even son of sardar was 2 hour 25 min?idk i didnt see it yet but ya heres another example next diwali 2013 i heard krrish 3 will release along with chennai express im not sure but if they do than im sure if they turn out to be only 2 hours or even less as some of you even think 2 hours is lil long too than i dout people would be satisfied completely with the film...btw ANURAG1700 barfi is out of oscar race now do you know it sucks cuz you love that movie you saw it 3 times in theater right?lol
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
As far as I am concerned for Barfi, no i never even cared whether they even send or not send it for oscars thats why it does not suck at all, and just to correct it, I watched it 5 times not 3. The fact that it lost the oscar race or that assuming any of department does not win any award, or even if that movie had flopped in first week still does not mean anything to me. It is important to leave all excitement in background and identify a film with a soul of its own with your own independent perspective without even a single external influence. I am afraid it takes time to understand this concept- I myself took lot of time. I have been in your place and so i very well know you will never agree with all this till u urself reach that stage. Till then, enjoy ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|