As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
 
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$101.99
14 hrs ago
Corpse Bride 4K (Blu-ray)
$23.79
9 hrs ago
Alfred Hitchcock: The Ultimate Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$124.99
1 day ago
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
 
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
 
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
1 day ago
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
 
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
 
Superman 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-03-2011, 02:03 AM   #1
kemcha kemcha is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
kemcha's Avatar
 
Dec 2009
Michigan, USA
18
344
18
32
Default Back to School (1986) (Rodney Dangerfield)



Back to School Blu-ray

Back to School Blu-ray Review


Has anyone purchased the "Back to School" Blu-ray yet, with Rodney Dangerfield? I'm curious how the quality looks on a 32" HDTV. There are no reviews posted about it anywhere.

Last edited by Deciazulado; 06-10-2011 at 06:23 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 02:16 AM   #2
DetroitSportsFan DetroitSportsFan is offline
Hot Deals Moderator
 
DetroitSportsFan's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Michigan
439
2226
93
Default

Should look fine on 32". I watched it on my 42" bedroom TV a few nights ago and thought it was average, nothing great. There's more talk about it in the Best Buy exclusives thread.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 05:18 AM   #3
kemcha kemcha is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
kemcha's Avatar
 
Dec 2009
Michigan, USA
18
344
18
32
Default

Thanks. I was just wondering about the grain because someone posted a very brief review that there was some problem with the grain and I was curious about how much grain there was and if it detracted from actually watching it.

I have purchased a few older movies that had some thick grain in it, such as Every Which Way But Loose and maybe one or two others and was curious about whether it's distracting or not.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 07:08 AM   #4
notops notops is online now
Blu-ray Samurai
 
notops's Avatar
 
Sep 2010
Los Angeles, California
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kemcha View Post
Thanks. I was just wondering about the grain because someone posted a very brief review that there was some problem with the grain and I was curious about how much grain there was and if it detracted from actually watching it.

I have purchased a few older movies that had some thick grain in it, such as Every Which Way But Loose and maybe one or two others and was curious about whether it's distracting or not.
I don't think you will find the grain distracting, unless you have an aversion to grain in the first place.

Back To School looks like FILM, warts and all. The grain structure looks perfectly healthy and makes me feel like I am watching a 35MM print, not some scrubbed-out digital thing.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
WBMakeVMarsMovieNOW (03-18-2021)
Old 06-04-2011, 10:40 PM   #5
Oblivion138 Oblivion138 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Oblivion138's Avatar
 
Nov 2010
81
2216
11
3
40
Default

I'm a big fan of preserving the look of film, so grain isn't a problem for me, and I'd rather it be retained than scrubbed away. But I have to say that the 1080 screenshots in the new Blu-ray.com review of this title seem...well, odd. They look very digital and pixelated. Is this (presumably) a problem with the screenshots, rather than the transfer?

If someone who owns the disc could compare the screens to the actual image on their display, and let me know, it would be much appreciated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2011, 12:14 AM   #6
DetroitSportsFan DetroitSportsFan is offline
Hot Deals Moderator
 
DetroitSportsFan's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Michigan
439
2226
93
Default

Back to School Blu-ray Review

Last edited by Deciazulado; 06-10-2011 at 06:24 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2011, 12:36 AM   #7
kemcha kemcha is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
kemcha's Avatar
 
Dec 2009
Michigan, USA
18
344
18
32
Default

While grain doesn't really bother me, I'm so sick of these studios not doing touch-up work on these older films when they're remastered for Blu-ray.

I'm sitting here watching Back to School and while the picture quality isn't too bad, the first 20 minutes seems to have gotten a downgrade to VHS quality, not an upgrade to Blu-ray quality. It's basically DVD quality. While I'm not complaining, I just wish that studios like MGM need to start investing money into upconverting their movie titles to Blu-ray instead of simply using the DVD version and transferring that to Blu-ray with no up-conversion.

I'm sure that there might have been some improvement, but, studios don't seem to be investing money into upconverting these films to Blu-ray. While I paid $10 for it, I wouldn't mind spending $15-20 for a better quality disk.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2011, 01:05 AM   #8
Atreyu Atreyu is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Atreyu's Avatar
 
Dec 2008
North Carolina
370
1876
619
1
293
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kemcha View Post
While grain doesn't really bother me, I'm so sick of these studios not doing touch-up work on these older films when they're remastered for Blu-ray.

I'm sitting here watching Back to School and while the picture quality isn't too bad, the first 20 minutes seems to have gotten a downgrade to VHS quality, not an upgrade to Blu-ray quality. It's basically DVD quality. While I'm not complaining, I just wish that studios like MGM need to start investing money into upconverting their movie titles to Blu-ray instead of simply using the DVD version and transferring that to Blu-ray with no up-conversion.

I'm sure that there might have been some improvement, but, studios don't seem to be investing money into upconverting these films to Blu-ray. While I paid $10 for it, I wouldn't mind spending $15-20 for a better quality disk.
I couldn't agree with you more. And also take a look at how bad Chaplin, Uncle Buck and Child's Play (also an MGM release) look.
If you read this site's review, they mention how grain can be taken out by expert hands, but the studios wil not do that with all their catalogue titles as it is cost prohibative. I was even surprised that it wasn't done for Midnight Cowboy. Let's hope we see a change in the not to distant future.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2011, 02:20 AM   #9
kemcha kemcha is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
kemcha's Avatar
 
Dec 2009
Michigan, USA
18
344
18
32
Default

I had purchased Caddyshack earlier this year and while that film had some faults regarding the PQ, I just think that studios need to understand that movie fans will be willing to pay an extra $5 or $10 for a better quality version of their films.

But, MGM seems to have a horrible problem with not wanting to remaster these movies and consumers are starting to be affected by that. If your product is getting more negative reviews on the merchandise you produce then you would think that this would be a wake up call because consumers are brutal when you release a bad product.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2011, 10:53 AM   #10
John The Grudge John The Grudge is offline
Active Member
 
Oct 2010
Kelso
450
67
6
Default

Cany anybody confirm whether or not this is region free?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2011, 02:29 PM   #11
Waboman Waboman is offline
Blu-ray Archduke
 
Waboman's Avatar
 
Dec 2009
In a van down by the river
197
500
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John The Grudge View Post
Cany anybody confirm whether or not this is region free?
Nope. It's region A.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2011, 05:08 PM   #12
HeavyHitter HeavyHitter is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
HeavyHitter's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
4
154
Default

I picked this up for $10 from Best Buy on the Sunday it was released. I think it looks pretty good for an 80s film stock comedy. It really was not DNR'd or EE'd. There are some film specs and dirt noticable especially in the first half of the movie, but all in all, it looks like film and I was pleased. Solid upgrade from the DVD.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2011, 11:19 PM   #13
Filmmaker Filmmaker is offline
Blu-ray Count
 
Filmmaker's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Tulsa, OK (but don't hold it against me!)
90
1162
3145
593
24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kemcha View Post
I'm sitting here watching Back to School and while the picture quality isn't too bad, the first 20 minutes seems to have gotten a downgrade to VHS quality, not an upgrade to Blu-ray quality. It's basically DVD quality.
Pardon my French but what a load of hyperbolic bullshit. I own both the Extracurricular Edition DVD and this Blu-ray and there's a marked increase in clarity with the BD. Rodney's drive up to the university shows punchy color and nice detailing in the roadside foliage. It sure as hell ain't AVATAR but it's a measurable jump over DVD and certainly VHS. A no-brainer for $10.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2011, 11:27 PM   #14
sancho sancho is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
sancho's Avatar
 
Aug 2010
74
909
Default

I have not watched my copy yet, but the $10 price that I paid at Best Buy makes the upgrade from DVD worth it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 11:44 PM   #15
Gruntled Employee Gruntled Employee is offline
New Member
 
Jun 2011
3
Default

I was wondering if it's worth upgrading to BR version if I already have the ECE DVD version, for $10, doesn't seem like you can go wrong, and this is one of my favorite Rodney Dangerfield 80s movies.

"Girls this is Lou. Lou, these are girls."
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 11:48 PM   #16
Clark Kent Clark Kent is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Clark Kent's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Metropolis
2
184
Default

MGM is always on the verge of bankruptcy, with little available cash flow. They do not invest one dime in their home video properties, outside of the James Bond catalog, so this is the best you will ever get as long as they still control the home video rights. The Blu-ray is likely taken from a HD master made years ago.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 11:53 PM   #17
koover koover is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
koover's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Surprise Arizona
446
3248
219
8
24
Default

For $10, you can't go wrong. One of the better 80's comedies and classic Rodney. I watched it and it's a marked improvement over the DVD.
Downgraded to VHS quality.....whatever
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 02:52 AM   #18
YodasFootPowder YodasFootPowder is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
YodasFootPowder's Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Twin Cities, MN
40
154
565
4
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filmmaker View Post
Pardon my French but what a load of hyperbolic bullshit. I own both the Extracurricular Edition DVD and this Blu-ray and there's a marked increase in clarity with the BD. Rodney's drive up to the university shows punchy color and nice detailing in the roadside foliage. It sure as hell ain't AVATAR but it's a measurable jump over DVD and certainly VHS. A no-brainer for $10.
I agree, comments like this are so ridiculous. VHS, really?! LOL! Some Blu-rays might look bad, I've never seen one I could compare with VHS.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 03:46 AM   #19
kemcha kemcha is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
kemcha's Avatar
 
Dec 2009
Michigan, USA
18
344
18
32
Default

The fact is that studios need to stop releasing Blu-ray movies if the quality is this bad. It's better just sticking with the DVD version. If MGM wants consumers to appreciate their catalog titles, then, at least spend some money to clean up the PQ.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 02:37 PM   #20
HeavyHitter HeavyHitter is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
HeavyHitter's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
4
154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kemcha View Post
Thanks. I was just wondering about the grain because someone posted a very brief review that there was some problem with the grain and I was curious about how much grain there was and if it detracted from actually watching it.

I have purchased a few older movies that had some thick grain in it, such as Every Which Way But Loose and maybe one or two others and was curious about whether it's distracting or not.
If the grain is that distracting to you, simply use the DNR feature on your Blu-ray player and/or display. I'm not sure why grain haters never think of this.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:33 PM.