Autographs on blu-rays

[Page14]

I wasn't sure where the proper place would be to ask this, but collectibles sounds like a possibility so I hope I'm posting this in the correct forum.

My question: As far as collecting goes, is there a preferred place to have an autograph signed on a blu-ray? For example, is it better to have an autograph on the cover itself, an inside booklet, or maybe the disc itself? ... or someplace else that I'm not thinking of? (... or maybe not at all)?

Thanks in advance!

[jscoggins]

Definitely not the disc since the ink could render the disc unplayable, even if the person signs it on the disc art side.

I think most people get the cover art signed, but I think a better place is on the back of the cover art if it's just blank white. That way, when you open the BD case, you can see the autograph through the transparent keepcase. This also keeps the cover art uncluttered.

[Just Jimmy]

personal preference really.

[Page14]

Originally Posted by jscoggins

Definitely not the disc since the ink could render the disc unplayable, even if the person signs it on the disc art side.

I think most people get the cover art signed, but I think a better place is on the back of the cover art if it's just blank white. That way, when you open the BD case, you can see the autograph through the transparent keepcase. This also keeps the cover art uncluttered.

I agree about not wanting an autograph on the disc itself. I might not have even thought of it, but many years ago, I had a music CD autographed by a band. All the band members were sitting at an autograph table. I handed them my CD and without even asking or saying anything, they automatically signed the CD itself. It still plays fine (and it looks great) ... but I always wondered about that.