|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $124.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.97 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $39.95 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $28.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.95 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.79 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.99 | ![]() $24.96 |
![]() |
#1 |
Special Member
|
![]()
(not sure where to post this, and, yes I searched and didn't find)
So, the last couple (or so) movies, some being blockbuster movies, I rented from Redbox have had only DD5.1 soundtracks!?! Anyone know what the heck is going on? I understand only putting the movie and a few previews on there without the special features, since it's a 24 hour rental, but, why the dumbing down of audio? (I still rent movies, sometimes before I can buy the movie, sometimes to find out if a movie is worth buying, sometimes if I missed it in the theater.) |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | coldheart (09-22-2015) |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
Were they Lionsgate titles by chance? If so, it's been going on for a few years already, unfortunately.
![]() https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=205502 |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Special Member
|
![]()
Nah, there's only about a 2-gb (maybe 3) difference between lossless and lossy... They can easily make the movie and lossless fit on the disc.
They do it deliberately because they want you to buy the disc to get all the 'good stuff' (lossless audio being on of the 'good things'), so they make the rentals as undesirable as possible... |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Lionsgate is really the only one to do it. Like Rik said it's done on purpose to sway people to buy it. To be honest it's worked on me I know if it's a good Lionsgate released film I will buy it and not rent it just for the audio factor alone.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
Why do they spend extra money pressing different discs for rentals? I would think they would save money by just using the same discs for rentals as for sales. ![]() Personally, if they want to sell us the movie, we need the full experience with the rental, otherwise we might think the audio will be crap if we buy it, right? WTF? I actually had problems with the channels on one disc, ...it was Insurgent, the voice would be way off center at times, terrible. ![]() Some of us can't buy every movie we want, when we want to, at the prices they are asking when they are released. Or, we missed it in the theater, for whatever reason, want to rent it so we can see it, and buy it later when we can. ...So, this is just B.S. and bad marketing, IMO. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
I can't count the number of times I've ran into a disc for sale in a rental or used store and had to put it back for being stripped of something. I thought the different versions were for that reason, so no one would buy cheap ex-rentals that don't count, and cut into, the studio's bottom line.
Even more annoying is when they don't offer the unrated versions the retail discs do. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|