|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $45.00 20 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $82.99 | ![]() $27.95 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $23.60 1 day ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $18.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $24.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $29.95 |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]()
Crutchfied recommends these distances:
Screen size / Viewing distance range for 4K Ultra HD TVs 40" 3.3-5.0 feet 43" 3.6-5.4 feet 50" 4.2-6.3 feet 55" 4.6-6.9 feet 60" 5.0-7.5 feet 65" 5.4-8.1 feet 70" 5.8-8.75 feet 75" 6.3-9.4 feet 80" 6.7-10.0 feet 85" 7.1-10.6 feet "To see the extra detail of 4K TVs, you should sit closer — we suggest from 1 to 1-1/2 times the screen diagonal." https://www.crutchfield.com/S-VR0aiv...placement.html |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
If you want to watch football/basketball and never get out of bed go 65". ![]() The 49/50" don't have as good as HDR perfromance - check rtings for display comparisons. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Active Member
May 2010
Southampton, UK
|
![]()
I’m with the much bigger sizes personally. I want an immersive experience like I get at my local IMAX. I currently have a 65” and sit about 6 feet away and it’s definitely not big enough for that true movie experience although it seemed like it was when I first got it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by slimdude; 11-07-2017 at 12:18 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
At the proper viewing distance, you shouldn't need to turn your head, remember these numbers are a guide so that you don't sit too close and get a screen door effect, or too far as to lose visual detail. In the end most people don't adhere to these numbers for one reason or another, but if your goal is to have the optimal visual experience then yes it may take a larger screen at your seating distance. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Active Member
Jul 2011
|
![]() Quote:
I find the THX recommendations to be accurate for watching movies. Vast majority of people have far too small TVs for critical viewing. Watching sports on a compressed cable single is one thing. Watching a movie in a dark room using a UHD Blu-ray is another thing and you want to be immersive as possible. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Active Member
Jul 2011
|
![]() Quote:
Movie theaters are a hit and miss. I'm actually at the point where I can get a more immersive experience sometimes at home because unless you sit in a premier seat at a movie AND you don't have other people making noise like eating popcorn or talking then your experience drastically goes downhill. With that said you are right in that a top theater can't be duplicated at home. I live near a real IMAX theater(one that is capable of showing 70mm) and if you sit in a premier seat it's amazing. Even non-70mm IMAX movies are better on that screen with the sound but screens like that are rare. Most theaters might have 1 really good screen and the rest are meh. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|