|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best iTunes Music Deals
|
Best iTunes Music Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $6.99 | ![]() $6.99 | ![]() $6.99 | ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $19.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $9.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
|
![]()
The upcoming 4K UHD release of Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho and Vertigo makes realize that whenever Universal upgrades a movie to 4K UHD, they're more likely to use DTS: X than Dolby Atmos.
I'm assuming it's because those films' original surround track were encoded in DTS-HD Master Audio. Of course I know nothing about sound mixing or audio encoding, but I'm wondering: do the studio actually take out the elements of those older surround tracks, and then mix them into a new object-based track, or is there a machine-learning software provided by DTS for the studios to simply convert DTS-HD Master Audio into DTS: X? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|