|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $39.02 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $23.79 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $35.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $24.96 |
![]() |
#2 |
Moderator
|
![]()
RMS (someone correct me if I'm wrong) is a list of the "sustained" power output if you will... rather than the "peak" at which it can hit. For instance, some subwoofers are 500 watts, but really only 200 watts RMS.
It's more important than "peak" power..... |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
What the first figure indicates is that the amp can't sustain that output across the full frequency range, probably due to a crappy (i.e., insufficient) power supply. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Active Member
Nov 2007
|
![]()
In the real world the only way those ratings would have any meaning would be if they were followed by the words "with all channels driven". Most inexpensive receivers test their amps with only one channel running not all channels and they do not have to make that distinction. That allows them to advertise 105watts per when in reality they might put out 50 or 60 with all running.
bill |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
It means that the amp can't delivery its full power across the whole audio range. It might provide less power in the lows, or less on the highs; one can't say just by looking at the spec. But as another poster speculated, the tail off is probably at the low end.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
It is not necessarily a matter of less output at lower frequencies. The impedence of a loudspeaker is most accurately represented by a x-y graph. The peak is inherent to the design of the speaker. That said, the 105 RMS is the most significant spec. However, difference between 105W and 120W RMS would not be significant in the real world. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
|
![]()
also remember, RMS tends to be a measure of constant power. In 12-volt audio, RMS is a very important factor since you have a constant output going to your subs, tweets and everything in between. with home audio, your audio is gonna be interspersed with periods of no sound or very low sound as well. RMS doesn't factor in quite as highly due to the lack of a "need" for constant power feed. Thus, in home audio RMS is a factor to look at, but it's not the end-all of performance to look at. look more for frequency range, signal-to-noise ratio and put RMS somewhere after those
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
LG BD590 spec updates | Feedback Forum | goodstuff | 1 | 03-05-2010 01:37 AM |
BD 3-D Spec. We know it's here. But what is it? | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | whbinder | 9 | 01-10-2010 06:02 PM |
HD DVD Spec from 1997! | General Chat | Josh | 12 | 06-06-2008 03:14 PM |
Euro spec 80 gigs? | PS3 | docjan_uk | 5 | 03-23-2008 02:04 AM |
BD Spec 1.1 ??? | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | sphdle1 | 11 | 10-25-2007 12:44 AM |
|
|