
Did you know that Blu-ray.com also is available for United Kingdom? Simply select the

|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Did you know that Blu-ray.com also is available for United Kingdom? Simply select the ![]() |
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 19 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.79 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $30.49 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $33.49 |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Jun 2008
|
![]()
HD DVD is dead & gone. Panasonic/Sony don't have to worry about MS using VC-1 money to fight them anymore. So why aren't more movies showing up in VC-1?
The way I understand it, it's the most advanced codec available. Highest profile w/ most geometric pixel block configurations & most accurate color reproduction. What reason would there be not to use it? Why aren't all the movie companies getting on the bandwagon? Seems like only Warner & Lionsgate are. Some are even still coming w/ MPEG-2!? What's up w/ that? ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|