|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $24.96 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $35.33 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $19.99 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $32.96 1 hr ago
| ![]() $99.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $20.07 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 |
![]() |
#1 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
so what is an SACD i know it stands for super audio compact disc. but why didnt it replace the CD. what is the main differences. do they still make them. where do you get them. what is an audio dvd or something like that. the main reason i was wondering is because i have the 60 gb ps3 so i was curious. another reason is was there like a format war between SACDs and Audio DVDs and did they fail. because i dont want the same thing to happen to blu ray or is it a completely different story. i really dont know much about them.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Super Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
Not the same fight as HDM, IMO. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
check out this thread for some good titles on sacd
https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=25046 also these sites are great www.sa-cd.net www.ps3sacd.com up the multichannel ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
no but it can play this odd little format called dualdisc. its a cd on one side and a dvd that plays multichannel surround on the other. but its not the same as dvd-a. also the ps3 allegedly can play dts-cds if you have the audio settings set perfectly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Super Moderator
|
![]()
I think the reason it didn't replace cds is, who needs 5.1 surround audio in a car. I think travel is how most audio is played, while I have some DVD-A's and SACD's I can say say I don't need it in my vehicle...
Also, MP3s... Last edited by JasonR; 01-31-2008 at 03:21 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Aug 2007
|
![]()
SACD and DVD-A died for a multitude of reasons. First was the format battle. Second was the cost was higher than CDs. Third, not much content was released to catch the imagination of the masses. Fourth, iPods and transportable music was more important to the current generation than higher resolution surround sound. It's a shame because if you've heard the difference between regular CDs and SACD or DVD-A, you'd want all your music in high resolution. The Elton John series and Pink Floyd DSOTM are killer productions.
Sigh.... |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
SACD didn't replace CD because consumers did not widely adopt it and the electronics manufacturers and record labels did not unite behind it. During this time I was frustrated that the audiophile community and music fans in general did not recognize SACD for what it was--the best shot at a hi def audio format we will have on optical disc.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Active Member
Aug 2007
|
![]()
Funny, I'm listening to Boston (first album) on SACD as we speak. Good stuff.
I think both SACD and DVD-A were poorly executed and in that poor execution they never caught on. SACD could have used hybrid disk technology to just replace CD's from those studios that used them. The disks would be more, but it would be getting disks out there. Hybrid SACD's are kinda like HD-DVD combo disks in that they have the SACD audio track on them as well as a regular CD one. They differ from HD-DVD combos in that they work ![]() IMO, DVD-A was doomed from the start. I love my DVD-A's...they sound awesome, but people need music to be lightweight and portable. As it is, DVD-A is a treat when I have time to sit in my listening area. SACD had a chance with hybrids, but that never happened. MP3's came around too. I often wonder if MP3's would have taken over if they weren't so widely pirated and shared. They had the portability that DVD-A would never have. Both formats are niche formats at this point. If you are into classical music, SACD/DVD-A are your best friend. There is ALOT of content for classical, also jazz. I suppose that music most benefits from the high fidelity of the formats. There's still a niche for them, but too bad they never caught on. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]()
I think lack of content on SACD really hurt its chances with the general consumer even if they had heard of the format. This wasn't like Blu-ray where every popular day and date title gets a release. There are other factors of course which some have mentioned.
SACD is still around but it mostly targets niche genres now. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Active Member
Aug 2007
|
![]()
If only SACD had Dire Straits: Brothers in Arms 20th aniversary SACD when the format was released. People would have been trading their spleen for it. Boy, this disk is magic. It's as if David Knopfler is standing on my face playing the classic guitar riff in Money for Nothing. You've never heard the nuances of that riff until you've heard this SACD.
Last edited by beavis667; 01-31-2008 at 05:15 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
A SACD can have a multichannel mix and/or stereo mix. Not all SACD's are multichannel.
A Hybrid SACD contains two separate layers. One layer carries the normal CD information and the other layer contains the high density SACD information. A Hybrid SACD can be played on any CD compatible player. However, if played on a standard CD player, only the CD layer will play. The SACD layer can only be played on a SACD player. Some SACD’s are not hybrid and play only in SACD players. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Member
Aug 2007
ca.
|
![]() Quote:
I have about 30 sacd's and 30 dvd audios new releases still come out but this is driven by the artist personal desires porcupine tree who continue releasing on dvd audio. sound & vision magazine cover music in surround sound new releases |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Active Member
Aug 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Senior Member
Jul 2007
Orchard Park, NY
|
![]() Quote:
True, but many SACDs are Hybrid, so you can have the CD track in the car, and SACD at home. Anyone who has heard SACD on a good 5.1 system knows how much difference there is. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Senior Member
Jul 2007
Orchard Park, NY
|
![]() Quote:
Go figure! ![]() I have 2 SACD hybrids on order, so I will find out if it is the one disc or a larger problem. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Super Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
David Knopfler, Mark's brother, played rhythm guitar with Dire Straits and left the band to persue a solo career during the recording of "Making Movies", which was released a few years before the band started working on "Brothers In Arms" One other thing of note is that this recording was a full digital recording for CD (DDD), which means the SACD format is not being fully realised on this recording. It is very likely that the digital recording was either 16/44.1, 16/48, 24/44.1 or 24/48. It's still great and a massive improvement over the SACD, but in my opinion that also has a lot to do with the incredible surround mix. They really hit the nail on the head with the surround mix - not one thing sounds gimmicky. However if this recording had been done on reel to reel analog, we would have an even better fidelity release on SACD. One need only check out any of Elton John's releases to see how incredible a DSD encode of analog tape can be. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
ADDENDUM: Not all Hybrid SACDs have stereo and multichannel layers. Some are only in stereo. Those that have multichannel layers WILL have stereo layers. fuad Last edited by WriteSimply; 01-31-2008 at 01:46 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Moderator
|
![]()
For audio-enthusiasts like myself, who listen to music in the home, SACD is like crack. Part of the reason this didn't "Replace CDs", is because of cost, and the internet. I'm willing to go out and pay for new discs, most aren't. My SACD dedicated player cost more than my PS3, so that could be part of your answer too..... most won't pay that much for what they percieve as "just music" Likewise, I have an older CD player (4 years now or 5 ?? ) .... just plays CDs, that's it.... and I got it for a steal at about $800..... People who don't appreciate good 2 channel audio will never understand those things, but to each his own...
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|